this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
245 points (98.4% liked)

politics

25399 readers
2703 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

American president angles for top diplomatic award while world watches his summit with Russian leader Vladimir Putin.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 108 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Dude is going to surrender Ukraine and claim to be a peacemaker, while sweetening the deal with a chunk of Alaska.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 43 points 1 week ago

America for sale. Everything must go.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

a perfect place for Putin to build a road and put tanks so that Putin and Trump can divide up Canada.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I don't want it this way, since both Trump and Putin are total goobers, but it would be cool to have a rail and road bridge across the Bering Strait someday.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bering_Strait_crossing

[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If the three major world powers (America, China, and Russia) ever sort out their authoritarian governments, it'd be neat to take a train across the world to Beijing.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

They put trains on boats in Italy

Might be simpler to take it across the Atlantic

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

Can you at least give Canada a heads up when you start making it even easier for Trump and Putin to get our country from all sides at once? Thanks.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Share a border crossing with Russia? No thanks.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

No, it wouldn't. It would be a vector for Russia to attack America.

The single biggest advantage that the US has had is the built in moats called The Pacific and Atlantic Oceans.

Putin is not a goober. Putin is an ex-KGB officer.

Putin shadowed Reagan in Reagan's visit..

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Did you not read their first sentence?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

100%. Russia likes to control the countries on their borders, to act as a buffer against invasion. Better to defend you country on someone else's soil, and destroy their assets. We use the oceans for the exact same thing.

That is, until he deliberately made enemies of those on our direct borders. Next he will want to control those countries, because he will feel it is very important to controlling the borders.

And all these ideas are coming from Putin. After their meeting, expect HitlerPig to start spouting all sorts of nonsensical concepts that would be terrible for us, but great for Putin.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Russia likes to control the countries on their borders, to act as a buffer against invasion.

And, after having engulfed many countries while building their empire, Russia now has the longest border in the word, yet still wants any state adjacent to its border to be subservient to it.

Fuck 'em. Russia should be broken up into tiny pieces.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why are no leaders playing him like a fiddle on this?

Ensure Russia ends the war with the same or less land than it started with and he's a dead cert

Reality doesn't matter to him so just string him along

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Well, Putin seems to be...

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago

My prediction is that Putin will offer him Alaska in exchange for Canada, and Trump will grab it, without considering that Alaska isn't his to give away, nor is Canada Putin's.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

And demand an award for how much better he is that anyone else at it.

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 91 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I just can't imagine being so immune to shame that I call to nominate myself for the Nobel Peace prize. Especially if I had raped children and it was widely known.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah it's like Trump isn't psychologically human, he's completely unrelatable.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He's a sociopath - just like the rest of billionaires. Having that much wealth, no matter how you got it, and keeping it, is already an act of great violence against many. But these people employ special psychologists and therapists to "get rid of" what's left of their conscience. They're essentially training themselves (and their children) to be psychopaths from a very young age. Even the ones who were actually born with something of a morality compass will have gotten rid of it by the time they need to step into the family company's hierarchy.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

I often call the Sociopathic Oligarchs, but I'm finding that more and more of them have graduated to being Psychopathic Oligarchs, including the Traitor-in-Chief.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

He's a bloated, walking Markov process of grievance, coated in bronzer, with a shitty rooster hairdo.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 19 points 1 week ago

His psychotic parents deliberately never instilled any sense of shame, guilt, consequences, empathy, etc. in him. He is a remarkably broken human, an actual psychological specimen. He should be locked up, and studied by scientists. Very few people have had an upbringing that was literally tailored to create a psychopath.

[–] rayyy@piefed.social 11 points 1 week ago

He is mentally a four year old who has never progressed beyond the me, me, stage.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No no it was John Barron who called, not Trump.

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

That's the one where he holds his nose and talks

[–] variaatio@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well Obama (not bad guy, but had not really done anything Nobel price worthy) and Kissinger (really bad guy who had no commitment for peace, guite opposite should it be opportune for his view of US foreign policy) got the price also. Soooo from that point of view it isn't too crazy from Trump's view to desire one.

Of course takes guite shamelessness to propose oneself of course, but yeah. Wouldn't be even close to first time someone not deserving got Nobel peace price. Which is sad, since on the other hand very deserving people over the years have gotten it. Giving it to non deserving people diminishes the recognition it gives to the deserving ones.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

He'll start threatening Norway soon, to extort a prize out of them.

Not that such prizes should be given at all to world leaders. Only ordinary citizens working for peace should receive awards.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 15 points 1 week ago

Smell the desperation.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What a weird, desperate loser.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

O come, blessed aneurysm!

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

It eats at him that Obama got one. He can't stand it.

[–] miss_demeanour@piefed.ca 19 points 1 week ago

Releasing the military upon his own people rubber stamps the award for him.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago

Given how the last decade has gone, I expect he will be given a Nobel prize.

He just magically gifts everything he wants. I hate it.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Just another reason the conspiracy theory about Obama giving himself the prize is bullshit. Too many people would have to keep a secret with no incentive to do so.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 12 points 1 week ago

"lol, no." Jens Stoltenberg, probably.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And can I also be considered? I say many things on Lemmy! Is that something that can contribute? Alright, how much? $200? You want $200? Man I only got $5.50. Is that okay? I'll get you back later man! C'mon! C'mon man! Peace price!

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Anyone can be nominated, all you have to do is persuade some minor legislative assclown to put your name in.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

“Yes, this is President . . ehh John Barron, . . yeah, that’s the ticket! And I’ve got a great candidate for you, for your fabulous bigly Famous Prize in Nobel . . . “

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 week ago

This has to be an Onion piece. Surely...

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

See if we can dig up Kissinger to present it to him.

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

The fact, that someone else as Trump even considered this, makes me ashamed to be human.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought he didn't care about the NPP

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

His envy of Obama knows no bounds.

[–] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 week ago

Another zany episode in the Horror Annals of the monster Donvict Trumpepstein.