Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.
I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!
It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
7. Content should match the theme of this community.
-Content should be Mildly infuriating.
-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.
...
8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.
-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.
...
...
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.
What the fuck? They did a mistake implementing a half-assed protocol and it's the end user that has to pay for it?
The "usb ignition" debacle didn't teach anything to those assholes?
Also, wasn't them that used a default passphrase in creating a SSL certificate for the CAN bus or something like that so everyone could reverse engineer that?
edit: yes, it was them, they used multiple "encryption" keys by copying them verbatim from tutorials https://programmingwithstyle.com/posts/howihackedmycar/
CheapGPT> Make car, plz?
That last one sounds absolutely positive though
This is some misleading reporting though, that same security flaw exists on all keyless vehicles, it's not Hyundai specific. literally part of the article.
It was also them that sold engines with machining debris still inside. When the debris clogged up oil passages the crank became oil starved. The engine would then self-destruct.
They denied it was their fault for a long time.
That was a great read. Thanks for sharing
This continues a weird anti-Hyundai/Kia push I see from the US, seems like a coordinated effort.
If you read the article or really know anything about keyless systems, this is not a HMG specific issue, look online for Mercedes, BMW SUVs being stolen with the same "Gameboy" device.
Here is a bmw m3 being stolen the same way https://youtube.com/shorts/1f2RaUswWAE
It's not clear at all what they are offering from the article, it's half assed reporting. It seems they are selling increased security not a "fix", there is no fix for this otherwise it would have been done already industry wide.
saying it's Hyundai making you pay for their own flaw is active FUD spreading at best, wouldn't be surprised if it's malicious paid for hit piece by US auto industry and it seems like based on the comments here it worked.
The actual article could be: Hyundai offers in-house increased security for their Vehicles with only a 50 dollar co-pay from the customer.
(These added security devices cost hundreds from third party vendors)
wouldn't be surprised if it's malicious paid for hit piece by US auto industry
I dont think it's quite so conspiratorial. This is low hanging fruit for journalists after the major issue they had with not including immobilizers as a standard feature.
If you know anything about car security, you'll know that chip and key immobilizers are miles apart from smart fob authentication, and that any vehicle from any manufacturer using a smart fob is vulnerable to a wireless relay attack.
I think someone is being paid to not understand the difference here. I think Hyundai cheaping out on immobilizer chips is unacceptable, but I also blame NHTSA for not requiring it in the FMVSS, Canada had none of the US' problems with Hyundai / Kia thefts because the CMVSS requires an immobilizer since 2007.
Step 1: obtain tool
Step 2: 'borrow' one car per night, add as many miles/kilometers as possible
Step 3: watch dealerships shit themselves
Step 4: be the silent reason why all affected vehicles get free fixes
They provided a free alternative: Park near a Kia 🤣
While these Game Boy-like devices cost around €20,000 in Europe,
huh, I could have sworn they were around $200-250USD online. I'm not great at math I'll let theverge figure out the exchange rate.