This case is not about tearing down a legend,
I mean, if the guy was a murderer who the fuck cares? He isn't a legend.
this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2025
179 points (99.4% liked)
News
32874 readers
2601 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Plenty to tear him down about even before this. New low for sure, but think joe arpaio with better pr.
When I see his name I just think of this .. which already I assumed was making fun of him.
Buferd T Justice
I mean he was presented publicly as somebody that refused to back down to small town corruption and the Dixie mafia. Which I think there is at least some truth to that aspect, but like obviously if he abused and then killed his wife, his own hands were probably never all that clean to begin with.
Kinda weird/hard to explain. Like the Dixie mafia did some really fucked up (possibly continues to do? Depending on who you ask?) some fucked up shit, but it wasn't really (and never has been imo at least) the "vice" aspect of what they were doing (moonshine, drugs, gambling) that was ever really the issue that made them the "bad guys" necessarily.
Pusser was presented as the straight laced Rex Banner type that came in and cleaned up. (Side point, but just believe in most cases when you try to ban something that people want rather than just regulate it, an illegal market is kinda inevitable. Morally questionable, but depending on circumstances, I'm just not sure how much you can really blame any individuals like moonshiners for providing something people would always be willing to buy.)
The Dixie Mafia definitely hurt and kill a lot of innocent people that got in their way, or were even just in the wrong place at the wrong time. And then I'm pretty sure they might have had loose connections with the klan and other hate groups?
Then there was a lot of overlap with local law enforcement and the Dixie mafia in small towns, so like if you were unlucky enough to end up on the shit list there just was no chance of justice. So Pusser was (publicly presented at least) one of the few people who stood up to the Dixie mafia when nobody else would.
But if you're willing to kill your wife, then try to make it look like the bad guys were responsible for it to cover it up, and shoot yourself in the face, it seems pretty unlikely there weren't a lot of other morally questionable things he also did along the way.
@Stamau123 Buford Pusser.
I remember that name from the movies, which I thankfully have never watched, along with Joe Don Baker, the actor who portrayed him in the original film (I think he was replaced in the third, if not the second).
There was a lot of publicity for that movie, which I think came out after Dirty Harry and was trying to get the same white male supremacist, ultra-conservative, reactionary audience.
Joe Don Baker was born to be MST3K fodder.
Yet he was also in the excellent British nuke-thriller series Edge of Darkness.
I suspect it was more a reactionary rehash of Billy Jack. Dirty Harry was already plenty right-wing in its underlying messaging.
I remember when I learned of it, thinking something seemed weird about this killing. I remember, years ago, coming across a forensic breakdown of all the inconsistencies in the Sam Shepherd's wife's murder scene and how that inconsistencies contradicted Shepherd's statements and implicated him. I'd love to see a similar breakdown on this murder and Pusser's statements.
Edit: link to the profiler breakdown on the Shepherd case.
WTF is reenactment evidence?
I would assume it's acting out the way he claims the murder happened and see if it matches the evidence. From the article it sounds like there were inconsistencies.
What is the real reason they're doing this now, 60 years later?
But how will Kevin Sorbo make a living now? Won't someone think of the conservatives?
“This case is not about tearing down a legend, it is about giving dignity and closure to Pauline and her family and ensuring that the truth is not buried with time,” Davidson said.
Sad fact of reality is realizing even the good guys can be pretty bad. Or in this case, pretty down right horrible.
I remember hearing rumors about this a few years back, and kinda thinking if it turned out to be true I'm not really sure I could honestly say I would be that surprised. Still kinda bummed to have it confirmed.
I never put this guy on a pedestal, but I've had a poster from the original Walking Tall hanging up for a long time (not even joking lmao).
It is a good movie (if you enjoy campy weird 70s movies), but there is also just something compelling about the story (not the reality obviously). The idea of somebody beating corruption, and wanting to believe if one person persists and refuses to back down because they know right from wrong maybe they can beat the odds. Idk, I guess the glass half empty view would be asking if the corruption and injustice ever really decreased, or if it just changed into something else?