this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
1521 points (97.9% liked)

Science Memes

16996 readers
1900 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Artisian@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Makes me think of this upcoming competition to find fossils that are not surrounded by the rocks that science expects.

I suspect a lot of people who believe (some subset of) the crazy nonsense are actually science inclined. But we (often/used to) teach science as about great people heroically defying the consensus and triggering a paradigm shift that changes the world. And that looks a lot more like vaccine denialism than pipetting samples for 50 hours. Some of the community spaces are clearly interested in thinking about the world, and there's a self-isolating effect of asking someone

"Why is there a tree that's fossilized across 5 different epochs of bedrock?"

and being told you're a crank. Then layer on the grifters.

So yes; do remember to talk people through the facts before labeling them a conspiracy theorists, and focus on the shared amazement at how weird/complicated/nuanced the data is. Ask lots of questions!

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 19 points 5 days ago

When I was a senior in high school, I needed one more science credit for graduation, so I took Human Anatomy. It was taught by a young hippie (it was the 70s), who also taught the exact same course at the local community college.

It was a great class, with lots of cool labs, experiments, and dissections. We had to memorize every bone, and every muscle. It was one of the hardest classes I've ever taken, but also the most fun.

That class was filled with future doctors and nurses, so none of them were whining about how they'd never use this stuff. But I wasn't on a medical track (I was a music history major), and I could have probably said that (I didn't), but I have used the knowledge I gained in that class literally every single day of my life, decades later. Easily one of the best classes I took in my entire life.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 53 points 6 days ago (4 children)

the problem is most emphatically not people skipping stuff in school, the problem is that the world is filled with people who have literally researched how to mislead and manipulate people. The only classes i think would actively help protect you against this is history and political science.

We can't expect everyone to be educated in every field so they can recognize misinformation, what we need is for everyone to recognize fascism and general authoritarian methods.

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

To your point, I've met quite a few STEM educated people who fall for this type of misinformation due to lack of historical and political literacy.

Quite a few are also quite disrespectful to the humanities so they tend to be empathetically underdeveloped since they feel their whole life is about producing results and making progress at any cost necessary.

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

I’m really happy to see this discussion here. Intellectual self defense comes from a well rounded liberal arts education. The type of people who whine about having to take general education and non science courses are already displaying an alarming lack of critical thinking skills; they are exactly the ones who need it most.

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 15 points 6 days ago

Appeal to emotions, rather than logic, and if you pull the right lever, that person will get a bias confirmation, feel smarter for knowing something everyone else doesn't and in some cases, feel less insecure for not knowing enough.

I've met people that have a degree or that are even teaching and have the worst baseless believes. It's only a matter of getting to your levers.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 6 days ago

Media literacy and how to validate sources. Unfortunately, the second part was primarily taught in college when I was still in school.

Critical thinking is very difficult to teach. Its so much easier for people to just accept whatever confirms their current preconceived notion. It also requires that the person is both open to learning new things and that they are open to the idea that they may be wrong, misinformed, or not know everything.

So many people are simply over confident about their own knowledge.

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

A bit of philosophy/media would help as well, it doesn't help to teach someone science, if they don't understand what science is.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 58 points 6 days ago (9 children)

I studied history (and by that I mean I liked to watch documentaries) and as a kid I saw educational cartoons and Anime (yes anime) that showed how there was a huge backlash against telephone and telegraphy when they first came out. With farmers blaming telegraph wire for destroying crops or crop diseases and they would sometimes even sabotage the wires and poles.

When I heard of the 5G bullshit that was literally what came to mind... it is incredible how eternal this form of ignorance is.

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 8 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The telegraph is turning the fricken frogs gay.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 39 points 6 days ago (4 children)

the problem is that critical thinking should be a reflex and not a mental effort

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 13 points 6 days ago (3 children)

It doesn't help that there is way too much shitty, agenda-funded science today. And science we aren't supposed to question. And science driven entirely by profit. Like, isn't questioning science part of science? Of course the response is completely unreasonable too. All of my family are research scientists, and if a discovery doesn't meet capitalistic goals, is it even a discovery at this point?

[–] Soleos@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's why you teach philosophy and critical thinking. Science will follow if that's the kid's interest. But learning to be being self-aware of your own position amongst others, including the position of Science, is key.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That is why I am appalled at Neil deGrasse Tyson's belief that philosophy is obsolete and exalt science as the ultimate foundation of truth and society. Where and how does he think science first came about? It was called natural philosophy before. And the scientific method has its roots from Socratic questioning. But I know that NDT is too egocentric to change his mind if called out on it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 15 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I will argue this is not the problem. It's that vaccines were too good in their effectiveness. A victim of their own success.

The problem is not and has not been science. The problem is messaging.

This is the same reason why anti-vax is so popular, you think that's about science? It's idiots like RFK Jr and Trump have the ear of people. It's all messaging folks.

A person is smart. People are dumb.

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

I have to agree about the too good in their effectiveness. To get to a point where people are just like, “Nah, it ain’t a big deal” is built atop the millions of dead.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The problem is not and has not been science. The problem is messaging.

Yes, but the actual factor driving this is the meteoric rise of the top 1% richest, it is wealth inequality that creates a coherence to misinformation by establishing systematic incentives. There have always been nebulous, destructive, cancer like forces of misinformation, it is as human as human can be but we aren't really fighting to transcend the pitfalls our own nature, we are fighting to get on the same page about the rich fucking us all over by artificially supercharging these tendencies within us for their own gain.

It is irrational to just see this as an abstract conversation about the human brain's susceptibility to misinformation as it ignores the costly material operation being undertaken to manipulate us with said misinformation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (3 children)

the bigger problem is that some teachers are so mentally checked out that they make those subjects actively unappealing. I wonder what makes them that way...

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is an important comment. We do not teach science on high schools , we stream students to science if they are self directed, then everyone else takes bullshit courses for an easy grade, these days acheived with LLMs.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blindsite@lemmy.today 6 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Your garden and kitchen = biochemistry and biology. Home improvement, crafting and anything to do with the trades = physics. Household cleaners, gas, automotive chemicals and plastics = chemistry + healthcare = more organic chemistry and biology. Just dealing with everyday life is science.

Look I think one of the fundamental problems here is we have a cultural divide between people with thousand dollar degrees and everyday people. When someone says "I'm not going to be a scientist" they're probably thinking "I can't afford to pay thousands of dollars to pay for a degree" whilst actual scientists are wondering "why don't people pursue this subject more?" Money. Pure and simple. Real science = cooking, building something, worrying about that scum in your sink, trying to figure out the best cleaner that won't set off an allergic reaction, and yes looking into the side effects of vaccines and assorted drugs. You want people to think scientifically then call them scientists. Don't create an economic barrier for those who want to pursue knowledge. And don't treat science like it only happens in labs. It's an every day process. Science = the study of nature and everybody can do that every day. You don't need an expensive degree to do that. So being a "scientist" shouldn't be limited to those in white coats, getting grants and have a dozen plaques on their wall that cost a couple thousand dollars to buy.

[–] PeacefulForest@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

My homeschooling, flat earth believing, anti vax mother never taught me science. She said I would never be a scientist so that was enough reason for her.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (7 children)

If smart people are so smart, why aint they in charge? Checkmate nerds!

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

"Smart people" are generally not rich people. They are coerced into labor like anyone else. Sometimes their labor is even useful.

They generally don't have the time or reason to participate in a counter-productive popularity contest.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago

Because with educatio comes a sense of ethics and responsibility. Anyone with ethics will never get accepted into any political party.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I've seen a lot of the counter balance to this which is STEM folk not having respect for the humanities, rendering them empathetically underdeveloped.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm so glad that people finally start to grasp, how bad excessive specialisation really is.

society is healing

[–] sleen@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Once I was doubting the need for higher levels of mathematics. Now as an engineer I realize the utility of this knowledge.

What made my change my mind? Well it's definitely not my intelligence nor my age, it's the practical application of that theory which got me here. Reading in between the lines can only happen if you like what you're doing.

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 5 days ago

I have a similar relationship with math. Only that I learnt to admire it through 3D and shaders.

Check out Shadertoy.com

People there create works of art from something, that's usually perceived as "cold". I'm still in awe of how people, using "cold" analythical methods achieve something so full of soul. I think it deserves to be appreciated far more than it is now. This is literal magic.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

People need to learn how to build a "firewall" for their brain.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 3 points 5 days ago

And epistemology to help build the firewall's list?

"It is the mark of an educated mind, to be able to entertain an idea without necessarily accepting nor rejecting it" --Whoever said that.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 days ago

Well the new world order is what the people in power want, but they only need smartphones and tv to do it. No chips in the brain needed, people are idiots.

load more comments
view more: next ›