this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2025
74 points (89.4% liked)

Europe

7630 readers
659 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The EU Continues to Send Billions to Moscow, Feeding Its War Economy

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HowRu68@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

OP has only been posting their own blog. according to crunchbase, " Jing Chen is the Co-Founder and CEO of SFG Media Group. Jing attended Stanford University Graduate School of Business. "

The about-us section of the site, states they're a native Ukraine based blog. But the ownership section describes Jing Chen as an Chinese-American. It doesn't make any sense.

[–] verdi@feddit.org 4 points 2 weeks ago

It does, manufacture consent to have EU people accept more expensive US gas.

We'll buy the US gas but the fat pedo needs to match any gas purchase in weapon donations to Ukraine. I would be ok with that.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We should just bite it and pay more for fuel from some other fuckers. Fuck russia.

[–] oneser@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's already being done in combination, and we suspect some of it is re-flagged Russian fuel anyways.

We should de-carbonize the economy instead.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

But that isn't easy to achieve, is it? Switching to EVs isn't a solution until we find mass production viable batteries and meaningful clean energy. Wind and solar are nice, but not really 100% working without batteries.

[–] germanichwurst@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe we could build put the EVs on rail and add an electrical line on top. Then we could increase their size to carry more people at once and then link the carriages together. Something like a train.

Of course it would require a lot of fatzos to walk for 10 minutes everyday

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Existing (and actually suboptimal batteries because their specs are optimised for a different use-case; see below...) batteries and solar/wind are already so cheap that a reliable production setup of renewable producer plus battery is cheaper than the alternative power plant. Real concepts not just picking whatever battery can be bought cheaply but build on purpose as large-scale energy storage (e.g. weight/size thus energy density does not matter that much for a stationary installation; charging times don't need to be much faster than discharging; thermal stability and high life times however are much more important - in short the stuff optimised for decades for handhelds and cars is far from ideal) are even better.

Our problem is not a technical one and not a financial one. The technical aspects got solved a decade ago and mass production with constantly decreasing costs solved the economic issue.

The actual problems are propaganda, propaganda and propaganda. Because fossil fuel producers hoarded money for decades and are now in a position where spending money to flood everything with desinformation and basically buy politicians to keep their profits flowing for another decade (or two) is much better for their bottom line than letting their already uneconomical business model die like it should.

[–] oneser@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

See, that's the thing. It IS (relatively) easy to achieve, just those who benefit aren't in charge.

There are enough solar panels, wind turbine manufacturers AND battery manufacturers to probably immediately kill a significant portion of fossil energy needs for power generation. But grid build-out and modernisation is still needed behind that.

[–] hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago

sfg.media has to be a credible source, right? right? same as trustmebro.media .

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Questionable source aside...

No, Europe is not "sending" money to Russia. They are paying for a good. One that had actual production costs, which -thanks to sanctions- are rediculously close to what they get for their oil.

When employees are paid rediculously low wages for what they produce for their employer that they only accept because the alternative would be starving people seem to understand the concept and don't hallucinate how someone is "sending" those employees money.

But when countries buy Russian oil at rediculous low prices (or through intermediaries that themselves got it at a discount price) because Russia is forced to sell it anyway as stopping production would be even worse for them (as in: it's expensive and complicated to restart once stopped) that concept is suddenly lost and that oil seem to magically drop into Russia's lap for free with a purchase of it creating a 100% profit margin...somehow...

[–] germanichwurst@feddit.org 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This war is nothing but subsidies for the weapon industry.

[–] HowRu68@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

This war is nothing but subsidies for the weapon industry.

What a bullcrap, it's all because of Ruzzia's agression and imperialistic ambitions. Stop your disinfo.