this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
450 points (99.1% liked)

News

32864 readers
2289 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago

Lot of talk...

We can't afford to give credit for people talking about shit. If it happens later, give credit to the prosecutors and low level government employees who make it happen.

The reason every primary is the same wealthy neoliberals, is they suck up all the media attention.

[–] Velypso@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

What a bunch of sad fucking sacks everyone on Lemmy is.

Jesus christ.

Someone wants to do something and its never e-fucking-nough.

Lemmy LeftistsTM would rather tear down anyone who wants to do anything positive rather than do anything that actually matters.

Every comment in this thread should be ashamed of themselves.

Holy shit.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 week ago

I agree. This site is fucking infuriating sometimes.

[–] dellish@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But he doesnt want to do something, that's the problem. Saying we might look at prosecutions maybe one day after Trump is out is not the action of someone who's wanting to do something while, right NOW, ICE is running amok in his city. Dems need to either act, or STFU. Enough with the posturing.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It’s almost like you need to KNOW who the person is and have an actual case to…uh, prosecute? You don’t just go throwing cases around. You do have to “look” into things first.

The people in charge of ICE are federal and have internal loyalists that won’t give up names or deployments to state authorities. It’s documented somewhere though and it won’t be found until after Trump is out because you need to get people in who can put pressure through firings and appointments who will then be able to collect that info.

[–] tym@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Here's the thing: Since ICE doesn't identify, any masked law enforcement impersonator could be an actual criminal. Stop and frisk of masked paramilitary isn't far-fetched with the right spin. As another said; this is calvinball at this point.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh, I totally agree. I think anyone with masks and paramilitary look, no or obscured plates, and unwilling to identify themselves with masks and gear on should absolutely be questioned.

The reality is that those people are hitting random humans on the street when no law enforcement is around which makes it hard for law enforcement to engage them if ordered to. When they are present, it’s at the detention facility and they’ve gotten pepper balled and tear gassed but I don’t know what legal route they have since it’s a federal facility and I don’t know what constitutes federal jurisdiction and is/isn’t allowed.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Considering that ICE doesn't allow congressmen and the like to inspect facilities, the obvious move is to consider those facilities to be unlicensed by the State. That removes the federal's ownership of them, because they aren't upholding the terms and conditions.

Add in roadblocks to prevent the trafficking of humans by ICE, where the police has to unmask ICE, take pictures, check whether plates & VINs are legit, whether the ICE have gun licenses and legal arms, and the citizenship status of people being transported by ICE, while allowing them to contact people. Also give journalists and civilians permission to openly document these proceedings.

Toss in a dedicated facility run by the state to hold potential trafficking victims, with the restriction that they must be deposited and kept there for a week, with access to a lawyer and care. Because we want to restrict what ICE can do to people, regardless of their actual citizenship status. It is better for a State to set such rules, rather than letting feds get the final say.

...to sum up: FRICTION. Every slow down and bit of awkwardness is against the "work fast and break things" mentality of ICE.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

All for it if it can be done!

[–] dellish@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Well, yeah, apart from all that. Fair points.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

People have stopped trusting democrats' stated intentions.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

You'll understand when you're old enough to have gone through the cycle a few dozen more times. Words are cheap.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just do it. The law has become Calvinball, it is time for the good guys to play accordingly.

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Is there a reminder bot on Lemmy? I bet you $20 in three months Pritzker will still have done absolutely nothing. Not one single agent will be arrested. This is a solid bet because one of them could ways roid out and kill someone in broad daylight, in which case it might be possible.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Amazingly cowardly speech.

“We aren’t doing anything today or tomorrow but oh boy just you wait!”

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“We aren’t doing anything today or tomorrow but oh boy just you wait!”

It's insane the degree to which both parties use this ploy over and over and over again, while people still eat it up every time as if this time will be different.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We’re strongly considering thinking about having a meeting to decide if we should do something at some point in the future!

[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But only to decide the color of the cover on the report we might write!

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Whoa, let’s not get ahead of ourselves.

[–] rocci@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So he's saying maybe he'll prosecute after Trump's term is over? What a joke!

[–] Arancello@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Remember though, the supreme court gave all presidents immunity from prosecution for crimes they committed during their presidency. So this whole statement is a joke

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

The president has immunity, no one else does.

If trump says “kill that guy” he can’t get in trouble, whoever pulls the trigger is in an entirely different situation.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 1 week ago

No one is talking about prosecuting Trump in this post.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Stop lookin and do

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Looking at maybe possibly almost going to likely fucking FUCK OFF.

WHEN ARE WE GOING TO DO JOURNALISM?

when is it enough?

I have an idea. The first main stream journalist that actually reports on the truth of US politics, I start a grassroots funding campaign to make that dude as rich as we can afford?

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

How many magazine and newspaper subscriptions do you have? There's actual journalism being done and I hope you're supporting them.

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Arrest them, charge them, and see how the regime handles it.

Action needs to be taken NOW. These Nazi's are weak and dumb, we can take them down, but we have to do it sooner rather than later.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Can't escape state charges

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Neat idea, Supremacy Clause goes brrrrrrrrrrrrrrr though. This doesn’t stop until the left has power at the federal level or something more dramatic takes place.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe not. That only says federal laws take precedence over conflicting state laws, but executive orders are not federal laws, plus violating a law is violating a law (I imagine they’ll abuse qualified immunity though).

While I hate to continue the partisan approach to justice, that applies here too, if the next administration doesn’t support the current fascism

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 1 week ago

Qualified immunity is only protection from civil litigation. It does nothing to prevent criminal charges.

[–] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

This is America, there's no left here