this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2025
47 points (96.1% liked)

politics

26230 readers
2372 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Bessent's paper-thin excuse doesn't hide the fact it is definitely a bribe for Milei's election.

[–] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

No it’s to repay creditors in New York who made Bessent personally rich years before this. It’s been a brewing story for a while.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/10/business/dealbook/aid-argentina-investors-bessent.html

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Debt vultures.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

The fuck happened to America first you hypocritical cum rags? You got infinite money for bolstering the far right around the world but none for human decency and development? I'm so fucken sick of these guys. What's the point of going to work anymore? Dont do it. Fuck this country. Stop everything. Right fucken now.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

That's could instead be $116 per American, for idk groceries? That'd get you through maybe half a week.

Or better yet, like $350 per American below median income.

[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

What the heck are you buying that $116 would only last you 3 days

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

For a family?

Rice, beans, tortillas, a protein, lettuce, bread, deli meat, seltzer, soda, juice, cereal, milk, eggs, butter, carrots, some berries..

After 3-4 days I have some rice, maybe 2 slices of bread maybe 2 cans of seltzer left.

That's about $100. Misc items (beer, wine, cat food, tooth paste, deodorant, toilet paper) easily bring it over $116 on a very consistent basis.

That'd last about 3-4 days.

Where do you live that this seemed strange? I can't recall spending less than $80 on any trip to the grocery store in the last 2 years or so.

[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Ah, you said per American originally but then meant food for a family. I thought you meant food for one person.

Per taxpayer it's closer to $300, which would be you and a partner each, so $600. Sounds like that's about 3 weeks of groceries for your family.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Do these weirdos practice these stances? Nobody stands like this with their fist under their chin unless they are posing for photos at Olan Mills.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I don't know jack about economics or finance. But perplexity is pretty good about sticking to academic research when instructed to. Answers condensed for brevity; I also bolded the final conclusion.

me: is the united states is presently supporting the Argentine currency?

Yes, the United States is currently supporting the Argentine currency (the peso) through various measures [...]

me: give historical examples where similar currency supports have achieved their objective

Mexican Peso Crisis (The "Tequila Crisis") in 1994-1995 [...] Asian Financial Crisis (South Korea) in 1997-1998
Key Takeaway success was largely due to:
Massive Scale: The bailouts were large enough to overwhelm speculative attacks and restore market confidence.
Strict Conditions/Reforms: The funding was tied to the recipient country agreeing to and implementing serious, politically difficult, and far-reaching structural and fiscal reforms that addressed the root causes of the crisis.

me: is the current $20 billion US bailout for Argentina sufficient in scale?

The current consensus among many analysts is that the $20 billion U.S. financial support package (primarily a currency swap line and potential bond purchases) is a strong political signal and a crucial temporary lifeline, but is unlikely to be sufficient on its own to resolve Argentina's deep-seated structural and currency crisis in the long term.

[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Okay, now ask "why should I pay for a bailout for Argentina while my government is shut down during failed (so far) attempts to cut healthcare?"

Maybe also "why can't a spending bill just be passed through budget reconciliation which only requires a simple majority instead of 60 votes in the Senate?"

Or maybe "why is speaker Mike Johnson refusing to swear in the elected rep from Arizona? Why isn't the House in session?"