this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
82 points (95.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

44036 readers
772 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When I search YouTube for videos related to my topic of research that I would consider pretty obscure, 95% of the videos are completely AI-generated, with ChatGPT scripts, AI-generated thumbnails, etc. It makes it really difficult to find video sources, so I have mostly given up on finding good information of YouTube nowadays.

For more general topics (smartphone reviews, food, fashion, and other topics that have a wider audience) the abundance of AI-generated videos makes sense. Pumping out thousands of videos that thousands of people will watch and earn a lot of money. But the videos on more obscure topics rarely get many views and there doesn’t seem to be much of a reason for them to exist except to piss on people trying to find non-AI-generated sources.

For reference, I am looking for sources for a Physics research project on observed baryon asymmetry in the universe and the different proposed mechanisms to explain it, such as leptogenesis and ew baryogenesis. I am very surprised that topics like baryon asymmetry, CP violation, neutrinos, etc. are filled with AI slop to such an extent. It’s kind of insane. Who’s doing this, how are they doing this, and why???

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 70 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It doesn't matter that these niche topics don't get many views because making ~~them~~ these videos requires no effort. They're throwing everything at the wall and some of it will stick, even if it's just for a little while.

Also, they want to drown out legitimate sources.

Edit: clarity.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

they want to drown out legitimate sources.

Who would "they" be, in these cases?

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The people making loads of AI slop videos. Or what are you asking? I don't have any names.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social -2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Yeah, I'm just curious who you suppose the people in question might be. Just a random distribution, or could there be some type of pattern there?

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Everyone who wants to make money from YouTube ads. I don't think there is a big conspiracy to discover here.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social -3 points 1 day ago

Let's rewind a bit, shall we? I wasn't expecting any conspiracy theories, but when the commenter above stated:

Also, they want to drown out legitimate sources.

That sounded like an interesting assertion, possibly hinting at a group-level effort, which is why I asked them. Thanks for adding in your opinion, I guess.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wait. Did you interpret "they" as "((((they))))" or something? ಠ⁠_⁠ಠ

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Haha, it felt a bit shades of ((((they)))), yes. Anyway, I was just curious if you had any particular group in mind.

It's not a significant question, so no worries!

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Good lord, I was wrecking my brain about what you were even saying, hah. I know nothing about the makers of AI slop videos other than that they fucking annoy me but anyone suggesting that they're somehow all members of any one specific group of people can fuck right off.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social -1 points 2 days ago

Easy, now. I do think that chatter in this thread has produced some good candidate groups, however.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago

Sorry, I don't know what you're asking.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 37 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It's basic SEO slop logic applied to video.

All the popular topics are already crowded, so you shotgun very specific search terms in the hope of capturing the majority of people searching for that term because nobody else has anything on it.

For instance, if you have a web shop selling fish equipment, "how to keep fish" is probably extremely crowded, so you would target a bunch of specific search terms like "how to teach crabs to read classical Latin"

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Now I wanna learn how to teach crabs to read classical Latin.

[–] Hond@piefed.social 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

My guess(!): Big topics are already crowded by big channels which get an algorithmic boost because of their past success. Its harder to get your slop prominently shown and establish your content slop farm with these topics. While with niche topics its easier to get your video to the top of the search results.

There are opensource tools like https://n8n.io/ to automate the creation of slop content. From what i heard its piss easy to setup. Like here is a half an hour tutorial to set you up:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1u54cy2nQig

Then you shit out the slop content and hope your channel picks up. If it fails to drive numbers you abandon it and start with the next channel with the next topic variation. If you get lucky and the algorithm blesses you, you continue to shit out hundreds of videos.

As seen eg in the video of redlyne about the dead internet theory. Where he looks a bit into the slop channels on youtube and other stuff:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnJKOYOkRMk

First line of the pitch for n8n lol:

Build with the precision of code or the speed of drag-n-drop.

At least they're upfront about the tradeoffs

[–] T156@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Then you shit out the slop content and hope your channel picks up. If it fails to drive numbers you abandon it and start with the next channel with the next topic variation. If you get lucky and the algorithm blesses you, you continue to shit out hundreds of videos.

I'm not even sure that you would have to do the abandoning part. There's likely toolkits that let you upload to multiple channels at once. You can just start them up and spread them out as you wish.

Why abandon a channel when it costs nothing to upload to it, and it might go viral one day?

A lot of older videos can be randomly promoted by the algorithm.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I guess that's sort of the whole money making appeal of new AI tools, previously it didn't make much sense to spend your time and often/usually money to make something if very few would see it, so you focussed on things that get a lot of eyeballs. Now you could more feasibly make something on kind of any topic and not even have to try very hard to do it since it's pretty well automated. With such low costs, even a tiny return is a positive return and you can just make a lot of stuff.

That said, I would think it still at the moment required someone directing the tools to generate something on a given topic and it does seem pretty unlikely someone trying to pump out videos with ads on any and every topic for a few cents of revenue hoping it all adds up would be able to have conceived of the topics you're seeing so I guess my theory falls apart there.

[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 19 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Dead internet.

Even the replies to this post are AI.

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] T156@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Everyone on ~~Reddit~~ Lemmy is a bot, except you.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

This is blatant bigotry against artificial lifeforms.

I'm being oppressed — mods pls ban this human scum

/j

[–] CovfefeKills@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What you are seeing is NotebookLM it is by Google it is meant as a study tool. You can go and upload a couple PDFs and generate a podcast to listen to while you work. I would say like many things automated - if you cannot do it yourself than it can benefit you but if you can read the paper and understand it well the AI talking about it is probably going to be the worse than just reading it yourself. Maybe it could be good again if you wanted to grab a bunch of niche topics and see if something with a big perception could offer any unique insights.

https://notebooklm.google/ it can actually be nice if you just want to passively get the gist of something while you are doing something else.

Please think about all the horrid responses in this thread with no fucking clue what they are on about these dickheads just saw an opportunity to express hate these are not moral people.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 7 points 2 days ago

My bet- it's the conspiracy nuts.

When AI videos started to flood YouTube, science was one of the biggest areas. It's stuff like "scientists discover potential signs of vacuum collapse", then have 4 minutes of clips before going full AI and rambling about quantum physics for an hour

I think they just take a grab bag of technical terms and theories, have AI spit out a title, and feed it into a video pipeline.

Then they bait and switch you

Now throw in a title about Elon musk discovering aliens, and anyone who clicks on it is probably low functioning enough not to realize

[–] plyth@feddit.org 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Just tells you how popular physics is among kids.

Can you link some videos? I would assume that the videos come from some reckless punks who are pushing for the idea that leptogenesis has also occurred prior to baryogenesis. They flood the zone to get new kids early onto their side.

You baryodorks just can't take the L can you.

[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Interetingly, most of the AI-generated videos I see are from "Physics Frontier" and "Profiles in Politics"(which isn't about politics at all, weird).

[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The AI-generated videos helpfully have a big red border (or rather, unhelpfully, as it draws more attention to them)

[–] plyth@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Thanks. That border is unhelpful indeed.

[–] mrfriki@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

This is exactly the same thing that happened when search engine started to get shitty a few years ago. It's just another step into enshitification :(

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Software that's easy to use will enable people to crank out content. Most of that content will be bad. But there could be a few gems hidden in the "ocean of gray goo" of cheap content. This has been going on for a long time. People were talking about this happening with music tools decades ago.

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 0 points 2 days ago

Bad content with new tools isn't a new issue for sure... but it seems pretty dominant in places

Another example is/was every time a space X launch happening (particularly starship) if you search space x or elon musk on youtube. That used to be pretty crypto currency targeted slop though

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Just guessing, but maybe content creators that focus on those niche topics are generating those for their videos? Like a youtuber who makes videos about blackholes uses AI-generated animations to depict stuff, for example.

[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 day ago

That doesn't explain the AI-generated models on the thumbnails holding up a small hand-sized globe (which is a geography thing, mind you!)