this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
220 points (99.1% liked)

politics

26151 readers
3443 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Texas supports DEI for Republicans.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

The Senate itself is DEI for Republicans.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

She's a pretty popular figure on the left and might actually get a lot better turnout than Beto (although certainly less with racist white "moderates" but their turnout for Dems has been lackluster). Texas has been purple, but you wouldn't know it given all the voter suppression and gerrymandering.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

Best of luck to her.

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Doesn't that mean she's just going to abandon the house seat to be between some newcomer and the republicans? Hope it works.

[–] digredior@lemmynsfw.com 57 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It likely means that her district has been gerrymandered such that she doesn’t stand a shot at winning anymore.

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She doesn't necessarily have a good shot at Senate, either, and the next person in her district probably won't perform better than her.

But I have trust she knows the landscape better than I do. I just like to assess all the possible things that could go wrong so we can deal with them appropriately.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think a lot of it will come down just how bad polling looks in her district and whether Talarico brings in enough money. Allred is better than any Texas Republican, but he neither excites the base nor reassures the squishier right-leaning suburbanites.

Whoever runs for Senate could possibly win, I guess, especially if its Paxton who emerges bloodied from the primary, but it's more likely that it's a means to show you can overperform and gain a higher profile in the national Democratic party.

[–] chocrates@piefed.world 2 points 1 day ago

I tried to read the article but it won't open on ecosia due to ad block. From the title I assumed her district doesn't exist anymore

Not necessarily. Depending on the gerrymandering technique that got used with her district she either got looped into a district that's heavily Republican leaning meaning she's likely to lose reelection now, or looped into the same district as another current Democratic Rep based on residence which would mean they'd have to fight over the district.