this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
643 points (98.9% liked)

politics

26166 readers
2576 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Democrats have only hardened their position as the government shutdown enters its 23rd day, leaving Republican majorities in Congress with few answers — and many criticisms.

For the 12th time, Senate Democrats blocked the Republican Party's government funding legislation this week without a single senator switching his or her vote.

Just three Democratic caucus members voted for the bill: John Fetterman, D-Pa.; Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev.; and Angus King, I-Maine. That means Republicans are still five votes short of the 60-vote threshold to ensure passage of the bill, just as they have been since before the government shut down 23 days ago.

Democratic voters had pressured their party to take a more confrontational posture toward Trump in the shutdown battle. The new stance may be paying off with the party’s base.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 14 hours ago

well yeah. they know once we hit november first its going to be more obvious to more folks what their bend over bill really does.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fetterman is a Democrat just like manchin is a Democrat, so basicly not a democrat.

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

Manchin was a democrat from a very right wing state. He never hid his views and that he was going to be very right wing democrat.

Fetterman said he was a progressive, ran as a progressive, and went hard right wing when he got in office. Yeah the brain damage changed him but I think he was always a Republican in Democrat clothes.

[–] ronigami@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Hope they downgrade the US’s credit reputation yet again.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Last time they did that, sales of Treasuries actually went up. Quixotically, the downgrade hurt the stock market. People divested of equities. And then they needed to move the money to a safe place. So.... uh.... Treasuries.

[–] ronigami@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago

Gold has a lot of transaction friction.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Goddamnit Fetterman be an actual democrat again for 5 minutes.

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 17 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Why hasn't he been kicked out yet?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Same reason Charlie Brown hasn't kicked that football

[–] iridebikes@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Seriously. He needs to be censured and removed from the party. Make him run as an independent.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What's the process for removing a sitting Senator?

He hasn't been kicked out because he won the election, that's how that works.

[–] iridebikes@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Senate can vote to remove a member with a two thirds vote. The last time it happened was 1862.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Need the ability for recall elections IMO

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I mean…we have an impeached, pedophile, multiple convicted felon as president. The wheels for moving someone unfit out of office have been painted over with gold glue made in china, for make America great

Kinda think we’re past ballot and closing in on ammo box

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago

The rules for removing a president are onerous to the point of unviability in a two party system.

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Well the literal answer to your question is guns

However what I thought was pretty clear in context is that I was referring to the Democratic party, not the Senate nor existence.

[–] FE80@lemmy.world -3 points 16 hours ago

Even if Fetterman was primaried, there would just be a new rotating villain.

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 74 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Keep it shutdown and keep the core message that GOP can end this if they cared about health care for normal americans.

Keep up the pressure and rally around the message.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 1 points 15 hours ago

The message from the right is that this is about Democrats demanding woke shit and providing health care for illegals. They're getting their message out there too.

[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We don’t negotiate with terrorists.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago

We literally do, though. We negotiate all the fucking time. Reagan was negotiating with terrorists when he said that.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 112 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago

He's just appeasing the Nazis. It worked back in WW2

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 201 points 2 days ago (14 children)

There is no negotiating to be had on the issue. Remove the cuts to healthcare or fuck off.

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's actually worse. With the pocket recision that has already been used, the administration has literally demonstrated that they will rescind any deal they don't want to pay for. Frankly, the only way to negotiate in good faith would be some legal measure passed and tested by the courts (because the pocket recision used to be illegal until this SCOTUS ruled in favor of it, like just in time for this budget needing to be passed), guaranteeing that the administration will fund what Congress has appropriated funds for.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 107 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just three Democratic caucus members voted for the bill: John Fetterman, D-Pa.; Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev.; and Angus King, I-Maine.

Hear that Nevada and Maine? You should probably deal with your traitors.

Everybody already knew about Fetterman

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Listing Maine’s as independent makes it odd to list them as Democratic.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

'Democratic caucus'; I assume they usually work with the Democrats despite not being one, a la Bernie Sanders

Democrats in every way but name.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Maine is working on it, at least.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 209 points 2 days ago

If we don't hold the line now, everything gets much worse.

[–] jackal@infosec.pub 68 points 2 days ago (23 children)

I was just telling my best friend that I think this shutdown is going to go on for six to eight months. Possibly to the point where the pot boils over and the government gets thrown away because it was closed for so long.

At least, one can dream that after months of bitter pain and suffering, we might possibly get people who care about others running a government. But that’s a whole hell of a serving of pain and suffering before we get there.

Fuck it, let’s general strike this place. Medicare for all with the govt reopen and all those critical services back or nothing ever happens again.

load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›