this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
647 points (98.9% liked)

politics

26189 readers
2927 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Democrats have only hardened their position as the government shutdown enters its 23rd day, leaving Republican majorities in Congress with few answers — and many criticisms.

For the 12th time, Senate Democrats blocked the Republican Party's government funding legislation this week without a single senator switching his or her vote.

Just three Democratic caucus members voted for the bill: John Fetterman, D-Pa.; Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev.; and Angus King, I-Maine. That means Republicans are still five votes short of the 60-vote threshold to ensure passage of the bill, just as they have been since before the government shut down 23 days ago.

Democratic voters had pressured their party to take a more confrontational posture toward Trump in the shutdown battle. The new stance may be paying off with the party’s base.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

One thing Schumer's good at is doing nohting.

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 203 points 4 days ago (2 children)

There is no negotiating to be had on the issue. Remove the cuts to healthcare or fuck off.

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It's actually worse. With the pocket recision that has already been used, the administration has literally demonstrated that they will rescind any deal they don't want to pay for. Frankly, the only way to negotiate in good faith would be some legal measure passed and tested by the courts (because the pocket recision used to be illegal until this SCOTUS ruled in favor of it, like just in time for this budget needing to be passed), guaranteeing that the administration will fund what Congress has appropriated funds for.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Sadly, most Americans have very short attention spans and will soon forget what the shutdown was about and will be more concerned with a short term crisis than long term health care worries. My worry is the Republicans know this, after all they manufactured this nation's eroded attention span and used it to gain power already.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 52 points 4 days ago (3 children)

The last shutdown ended after 35 days when LaGuardia was shutdown due to protests ftom airport workers who weren't getting payed.

My prediction is a similar thing will happen.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 39 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They are about to miss a full paycheck this weekend, and it's the end of the month, bills are about due. Things are about to start hurting.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago

If only we had an extra 40 billion...

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Man. It would royally suck if some government flights stayed grounded because air traffic control refused to work. 😐

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Every single newspaper acts like only the Democrats have any agency.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We don't have another opposition group in politics who have any power or political capital at all, so we're pressing on them to do their job for once. They are doing the right thing by holding out so the GOP doesn't gut social services, I wish they could have held out stronger in many other standoffs. People like Schumer have let us down over and over by making concessions and ignoring what people want.

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah, I'm actually happy with the Dem response here, and I don't really compliment them often.

I'm annoyed that the press, as always, is completely in Republicans' pockets. Notice how the whole article is practically waiting with bated breath for the Democrats to give in and open the government? They bury any talk of the ACA a few paragraphs in. The possibility that the Republicans could reopen the government by agreeing to extend healthcare subsidies is not really contemplated.

I've seen many articles across different papers, and this is a theme. Their narrative is that the Dems have shut down the government. Republicans defunding healthcare is always a foregone conclusion, and the story is always about the competition, never about the substance of the fight.

One reason people treat politics like a team sport is because that's how it's always covered.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 210 points 4 days ago

If we don't hold the line now, everything gets much worse.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 113 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 days ago

He's just appeasing the Nazis. It worked back in WW2

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 75 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Keep it shutdown and keep the core message that GOP can end this if they cared about health care for normal americans.

Keep up the pressure and rally around the message.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 107 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Just three Democratic caucus members voted for the bill: John Fetterman, D-Pa.; Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev.; and Angus King, I-Maine.

Hear that Nevada and Maine? You should probably deal with your traitors.

Everybody already knew about Fetterman

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Maine is working on it, at least.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Fetterman is a Democrat just like manchin is a Democrat, so basicly not a democrat.

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Manchin was a democrat from a very right wing state. He never hid his views and that he was going to be very right wing democrat.

Fetterman said he was a progressive, ran as a progressive, and went hard right wing when he got in office. Yeah the brain damage changed him but I think he was always a Republican in Democrat clothes.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Goddamnit Fetterman be an actual democrat again for 5 minutes.

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 17 points 3 days ago (10 children)

Why hasn't he been kicked out yet?

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Because there are lots of Fettermen. He's just the most visible one.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Same reason Charlie Brown hasn't kicked that football

[–] iridebikes@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Seriously. He needs to be censured and removed from the party. Make him run as an independent.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We don’t negotiate with terrorists.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

We literally do, though. We negotiate all the fucking time. Reagan was negotiating with terrorists when he said that.

[–] jackal@infosec.pub 68 points 4 days ago (23 children)

I was just telling my best friend that I think this shutdown is going to go on for six to eight months. Possibly to the point where the pot boils over and the government gets thrown away because it was closed for so long.

At least, one can dream that after months of bitter pain and suffering, we might possibly get people who care about others running a government. But that’s a whole hell of a serving of pain and suffering before we get there.

Fuck it, let’s general strike this place. Medicare for all with the govt reopen and all those critical services back or nothing ever happens again.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] ronigami@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hope they downgrade the US’s credit reputation yet again.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Last time they did that, sales of Treasuries actually went up. Quixotically, the downgrade hurt the stock market. People divested of equities. And then they needed to move the money to a safe place. So.... uh.... Treasuries.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kalon@lemmy.world 63 points 4 days ago

From this start it seemed likely to me that they would hold out until Heath Insurance rate letters stated going out.

[–] shaggyb@lemmy.world 38 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Good. Hold the fucking line.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I’m gonna have to vote for Fetterman in three years, aren’t I.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 58 points 4 days ago (2 children)

That depends on whether someone in PA can assemble the resources needed to primary him.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 50 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I honestly dont expect him to run for reelection. The guy seems to absolutely hate being a senator after having a stroke. He definitely despises being in the public eye or the center of attention to some degree. He also seems to not really have much awareness of things going on around him in general anymore. He really should not be in such a stressful position in his current state of health, and I doubt he wants to be. Pride is probably the sole thing keeping him from stepping down. It definitely isnt his love for being in the role, that is for sure

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago

Pride is probably the sole thing keeping him from stepping down.

I think that sums up so many of the Democratic Party's problems.....

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 49 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Oct 16 - Daily Beast

Top-ranking Democratic Party officials in Pennsylvania are gearing up to run against Sen. John Fetterman in a 2028 primary contest, according to a report.

Big names in the state who could well run against the increasingly embattled incumbent include House Representatives Brendan Boyle and Chris Deluzio, along with former Congressman Conor Lamb, Axios reports, citing multiple inside sources.

Axios added it was not clear whether Fetterman, who is understood to have ambitions of running for the White House, plans to run again for the Senate or the presidency in 2028.

Fetterman texted Axios saying, “enjoy your clickbait!” and requested “please do not contact” in response to follow-up questions. He also shared an article citing him as one of “the least Trump-aligned Democratic lawmakers in the state.”

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Lmao at that last sentence..

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›