this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
1171 points (95.3% liked)

Memes

47261 readers
1682 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bstix 98 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And then when they all believe, you change the rules because you accidentally spawned to many people.

God: "I can only save some of you!"

People: "How many?"

God: "Twelve.."

People: "Twelve?!? But there are many more of us"

God: "Times 12..."

People: "144?!? But there are still many more!"

God:"... thousand."

People "Oh lord, I'm one of those 144000, right?"

God: "Of course you are my dear".

Other people:"...but you already saved more than 144000 before we were even born?"

God:" yeah well, just believe me OK?"

[–] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's amazing that there are so many different interpretation. Religious people have such creative imaginations.

[–] Kiosade@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m reading a fictional book series where a character in the first few books literally becomes the new god… then the later books take place a few hundred years later, and you see how the new god laid everything out for the people, and gave them books on how to prosper and all this valuable info… and STILL these idiots ended up forming various competing religions, full of BS!

[–] 9bananas@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Kiosade@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago
[–] Mercival@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean, the trolley obviously can't fit under the bridge, so this seems like a mass murder/suicide scenario.

[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

The bridge will part!

[–] eatham@aussie.zone 14 points 1 year ago

What if the trolley can shrink when going under the bridge

[–] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What if they accept that I'm the creator of the situation but I still don't save them as I promised?

[–] radioactiveradio@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

You have a plan, that doesn't involve them. And it was all for good.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

No no no, doesn't stop there.

Then you created a business, run by your most....devout... followers, they'll manage the business.

You pay them to collect money for you, and um, teach them the ways and make sure they bring their families and friends in.

You tell them they are all horrible people who will suffer in eternity unless they worship you and thank you that they were born.

Then your managers, they meet with all your followers and ~~shake them down~~ tell them how important it is to fund the business.

It's a very complex thing really being the creator of the universe and having to have people start a business to fund..um...worshiping you....

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When a creator does it, the word is "ineffable". Just like how when I'm rich, I'll become eccentric.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, fuck that. I'm eccentric now. What's a rich guy going to do about it?

They'll be beside themselves if this ever gets out. They might be driven to buy multiple motor yachts that they'll never even clap eyes on, to cope with that

[–] ThePac@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

For this to be more accurate you need to take the "God" out of the image entirely.

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

Of course that is not something I could judge by myself. You will have to ask the people in the situation and see what they will answer of their own free will.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Substitute the trolley for a tornado, the tracks for homes, the deity killing randomly with said tornado, and the survivors thanking deity for their survival (and their neighbors’ deaths).

Not a good analogy? Of course it isn’t. God doesn’t exist, and if he does, he’s perfectly happy killing you and destroying your family for no reason whatsoever, and your neighbors will thank him for doing so.

[–] EnlightenMe@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Evil is a dumb term. The word they are looking for is "responsible".

[–] TvanBuuren@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

It was already a fun thread, but this comment upps it a notch.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And then here comes Cormac McCarthy (RIP) to shit all over your idea of some benevolent god, to give you a real sense of how chaotically brutal the reality of life actually is, to question autonomy and the very notion of free-will, and to maybe, as a side-effect of literature, to make you think twice about everything you've assumed about the world.

Gonna miss that guy.

I don't know why the Nobel asswipes didn't give him the recognition he deserved.

My guess is that his work was too "American" for their tastes.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In this situation, I could see it being done in order to announce that you have the power to alter reality on a whim, and really need people to get with the program.

So I would say it would depend on your other intentions, as if you have the creative power that is chested, you could easily bring someone back to life and place them in another scenario until they actually understand what you're trying to tell them.

I don't have enough information to ascertain whether or not the omnipotent being is evil or just a prankster.

[–] pixelscript@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why do you have to "announce" your capabilities to beings you designed? Why do you have to onboard them to your "program" at all? If you truly are omnipotent, simply make beings that already know, and are already with the program. Assuming that is indeed what you want, why would you do anything else?

Are you throwing in extra steps for your own amusement? Just as a prank? Why? You're omniscient. You already know how it ends. What's amusing about it?

You are either toying with beings you created to be non-accepting and deliberately presenting conditions that won't convince them, or you're lacking one or both of omnipotence or omniscience.

An argument straight from the edgy teen atheist textbook, sure, but nonetheless one I have yet to see a compelling rebuttal for.

[–] Cranakis@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But, by your argument, you do have enough evidence to rule out benevolence, no?

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

No not really, my friends and I fuck with each other all the time, but we never do permanent harm or majorly inconvience each other.

If I could just snap my fingers and rewrite reality, I'd totally put those closest to me through a haunted mansion to be just by a serial killer, maybe even have them die a couple of times as a joke...

Then I'd bring them back to life and we'd go to the planet of nymphomaniacs to laugh it off over a few ambrosial liqours and impossibly large breasted company.

"You really had me going with the whole Saw trap, but then when I cut off my leg to escape the trap you changed my biology so that I could just re-attach it. Such a kidder."

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

You're not mysterious! You're just a jerk!

[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I feel like that would make me some edgy child, messing around with legos or playdough.

[–] unreasonabro@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I mean, if evil always shoots itself in the foot, this guy's off to a good start. Why would you get them to agree to blame you for putting them there, and then free them? Chaotic stupid.

[–] Manmoth@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ITT: A collectively poor understanding of Christian theology

[–] BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why did you assume "christian theology" ? I can think of many religion that fit the description

[–] Manmoth@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

If you think Christianity fits this description then you have a poor understanding of Christianity.