Nintendo

20976 readers

181 users here now

A community for everything Nintendo. Games, news, discussions, stories etc.

Rules:

Stay on topic.
No NSFW content.
No hate speech or personal attacks.
No ads / spamming / trolling / self-promotion / low effort posts / memes etc.
No linking to, or sharing information about, hacks, ROMs or any illegal content. And no piracy talk. (Linking to emulators, or general mention / discussion of emulation topics is fine.)
No console wars or PC elitism.
Be a decent human (or a bot, we don't discriminate against bots... except in Point 8).
All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here
Links to Twitter, X, or any alternative version such as Nitter, Xitter, Xcancel, etc. are no longer allowed. This includes any "connected-but-separate" web services such as pbs. twimg. com. The only exception will be screenshots in the event that the news cannot be sourced elsewhere.

Upcoming First Party Games (NA):

Game | Date

[S2] means Switch 2 only.

Other Gaming Communities

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

slimerancher@lemmy.world

CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemmy.world

CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemdro.id

picandocodigo@lemmy.world

What do you think the Switch successor should be called? Keep the Switch name or nah? (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 years ago by Wussy@lemmy.world to c/nintendo@lemmy.world

63 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I think things would've worked out differently if Nintendo hadn't messed up the naming of the Wii U. We probably would've had a line up like this:

• Wii
• Wii Pro (Wii U)
• Wii Portable (Switch)

They're at that crossroad again with the Switch name. What do you think the Switch successor should be called? Keep the Switch name or nah?

(page 2) 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Rob@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Super Switch would sort of make sense given Nintendo’s history, but it’s a shitty decision going forward. Even if you like the name, it just pushes the difficulty of renaming down to the next console generation.

Switch 2 would be fine, but I can’t see Nintendo going for it. An entirely new name would probably be the best outcome. Or they’ll pull another “New Switch U Plus” out of thin air.

[–] Seven@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Nintendo Switch AMOLED

[–] Ertebolle@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Assuming it's backwards-compatible with Switch games - and it really, really should be - then "Switch 2" is the logical choice; there's a reason everybody except Microsoft (who have a weird relationship with names in general) sequentially numbers their flagship hardware, it's easy to remember and easy to search for and instantly obvious what it is.