this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
76 points (86.5% liked)

Technology

63134 readers
3423 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

If a headline is phrased as a question, i.e. "Will X takeover the world this month?", then the answer is always no, because if the answer was yes they would have written "X will takeover the world by the end of the month" which is a much more declarative and attention grabbing headline.

Similarly, if a headline says something "could do X" that means it won't because if it was going to the reporter would have written that it "will do X".

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Described well. Link to the relevant wikipedia article:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_law_of_headlines

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Headline: Studies show French toast may cause cancer.

Then again, it may not.

[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why are you picking on the French? If I had my guess, I would assume Texas toast would be worse in that regard. Lol

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago

All toast matters

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Since it contains burnt byproducts, it probably does. Like 0.001% more chance of cancer per toast per hour or something.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 year ago

It won't ever be your cell phone screen. Optically, it's less clear than what we have, and while the wood/epoxy is "tough", wood is not "hard". It will scratch easily.

[–] Introversion@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s an interesting line of research, but unless they can completely remove all visual traces of grain, etc, so that it’s very clear, it’s not going to be a replacement for glass in either screens or windows. And I’m skeptical that’s possible.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I've got a couple frosted windows that I'd love to be as insulating as wood, I can see it maybe being used for that.

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

It would also be useful for blinds. My doggie is a bit of a little jerk and wrecked mine trying to look outside while they were closed. Wood blinds would likely be a lot more resilient

[–] Kichae@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, I'd take a woody window to replace the clear glass overlooking the scenic parking lot outside literally any of the apartments I've ever lived in.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

If it's anything like NileRed's "transparent wood" it won't work for shit as a window, except as like a privacy window that just lets light through.

[–] aev@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] kambusha@feddit.ch 24 points 1 year ago

Could. Should. Wood.

[–] Beelzebob@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

An iPhone user will still break it.

[–] deleted@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wood is wood and wood breaks.

Not bad.