chuckleslord

joined 2 years ago
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

(Lawsuit is about their pride merch causing boycotts, not the removal of DEI) I agree, currently not shopping there and will continue to du so cause they pulled DEI. Can't capitulate to fascists

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

That's Reverse Flash

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Volo: I've been kidnapped several times! Here's all the things I found out during my captivity!

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That's a weird picture of Theodore Roosevelt.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Well, ya see, gotta reduce the number of companies. The less companies, the more the line goes up

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Spoiler: it's a quid pro quo, like they've been telling anyone willing to listen.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Here's the possible impact sites. Ocean is a pretty good chance, and that would mean even less impact. If it's close to shore, then there's a chance for waves, but that's about it. Locations are based on the timing of when the asteroid will arrive in 2032, not the shape of the orbit which we have fairly good accuracy on (that's why the "beam" of possibilities is so narrow)

Currently, we're unable to directly observe the asteroid due to the distance, but we do have a good idea on what its orbit looks like, so any updates on the odds is coming from past, unintentional observations on the asteroid (we took a photo of something else in the sky, but know that the asteroid should be in that photo).

When the asteroid passes by again in 4 years is when we'll likely get the most info on location/impact before the potential impact in 2032.

All this info comes from this Scott Manley video. He's an excellent space science educator (and KSP player)

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

If anything, it might get a tiny bit warmer

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (5 children)

A direct hit would be about the size of a fission nuclear bomb. Devastating for a city, but no regional or country-wide impacts, let alone globally

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I think that's the draw, yeah? It's like Twitter, without the madness

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Yeah, that's the shit rich people want you repeating. It makes it seem impossible to resist them.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Listen. It's not just dumb voters. It's a conservative propaganda vessel that funds any right-leaning talking points. It's madness being poured into any willing ear, all it takes is a little fear to let them in. I want to believe that individual volition trumps this by-the-numbers propaganda, but the proof is in the pudding. Make people scared and isolated and you can make them believe whatever shit you want (at least, on a macro scale)

 

Before downvoting, check the community.

If you fail to use the /s tag or specifically call out that your comment is sarcastic, I'm going to treat it as being earnest. I might ask if you're being sarcastic, but I will downvote as though you are being earnest.

The /s tag not only clarifies, but it also confirms that you're being sarcastic. A thing you cannot ordinarily convey via written text unless you specifically call it out. You can hint at it, readers can infer it, but you cannot convey it. To convey it, sans directly stating it, you would need to include a recording of you speaking the comment, which defeats the whole point of text chats.

"It definitely reads as sarcasm, you're just missing it" So what? I'm neurodivergent. I barely get this shit in its normal, spoken context. Why should I be expected to understand the implied sarcasm in your text comment?

"Telling someone you're being sarcastic ruins it" Unless your definition of sarcasm is just lying to someone's face, you do indicate sarcasm when speaking. Via the exaggerated, deadpan tone you use. Something you can't convey in written text unless you specifically call it out.

"I made it very clear via hyperbole that it was sarcasm" Have you talked to people? Your obvious, over-the-top, hyperbolic sarcasm could just be someone's opinion taken whole cloth. In fact, you probably modeled your exaggeration AFTER a person. Can you see why, if I don't know you, there's no way to tell?

"I forgot the tag" cool, if I see the edit adding it back in, I'll revert my downvote. Consider it the opportunity cost of forgetting.

"It doesn't hurt anyone" Yes, it does. You give credence to your exaggerated position that you would never take because the people who think like that exaggerated position will point to your comment as proof that they have support. It's why 4chan rebirthed nazism.

"I still won't do it". Then have fun with the downvote. You want to make the internet worse? I'll be sure that you don't get the internet points your brain craves.

view more: next ›