this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
353 points (100.0% liked)

196

17027 readers
670 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jalda@sopuli.xyz 38 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That is not Sisyphus, it is Sisyphus' shadow on the wall of the cavern

[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's actually Sisyphus' Monster.

[–] delitomatoes@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

It was Dr Sisyphus who was the monster

[–] LucyLastic@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Damn your comment made me giggle!

[–] Andonno@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hilbert's Grand Hotel can absolutely hold Sysiphus and his boulder, just move everyone two rooms up.

Theseus' ship is only paradoxical on the faulty premise that the ship existed in the first place.

[–] Uriel238@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Hilbert's Grand Hotel can manage an infinite number of boulders, each containing an infinite number of Sisyphuses (Sisyphi? Sisyphes? Sisyphodes?) by designating each boulder a prime number and each Sisyphus a counting number, and multiplying the two to get their room number.

This leaves some rooms open for additional guests, which may get management angry about underutilized rooms. There are other configurations that pack everyone in more tightly.

[–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 years ago

His happiness depends on whether or not a radioactive substance in a box has decayed, which has a 50% chance. But since it has not been observed, he is in a superposition of happy and unhappy.

[–] TheSpookiestUser@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Personally I'd love to be the subject of a philosophical problem so I'd say he's probably pretty stoked

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

I'm gonna need more weed, please.

[–] WolfyGamer29@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] forrgott@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

Oh, c'mon, obviously the answer is 42.

[–] flop@lemmy.fmhy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

I'd imagine so

[–] Monologue@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago

"the ultimate answer to life, the universe, and everything is… 42!"

there is no reason to assume this is not relevant for this case too