this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
377 points (97.7% liked)

Damn, that's interesting!

5630 readers
1 users here now

  1. No clickbait
  2. No Racism and Hate speech
  3. No Imgur Gallery Links
  4. No Infographics
  5. Moderator Discretion
  6. Repost Guidelines
  7. No videos over 15 minutes long
  8. No "Photoshopped" posts
  9. Image w/ text posts must be sourced in comments

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
9Q6u7hroWkwW9@lemmy.ml
377
Confusing perspective (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 2 years ago by sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to c/damnthatsinteresting@lemmy.ml
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 100 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I like this style, just don't know what it's called.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 63 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I can't speak for the photography style, but that style of using walls of ice in a composition is called "impossible in 30 years"

[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Haha! Oh, now I’m sad. :(

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Me too, buddy. Me too. :(

[–] Vash63@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's very optimistic of you to think humans will be around to have names for such things in 30 years.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Ah, sorry. Is "anti-hot apartment tower made from solid aqua cola and lacking residents" better?

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Checkers

[–] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

A tetraptych or pseudo-tetraptych maybe? Closest concept I can think of.

[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 38 points 2 years ago

The upper right quadrant is a terracotta wall that goes right up to the water. Below that in the photo is the reflexion of the wall. The left half is just normal water with no reflexion.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's a really interesting composition. I'm not a fan of these kinds of things being called "unaltered"/"unedited", because after a bit of searching I can't find any evidence of that. But it certainly is not a composite.

If it's shot on film, it's possible the saturation is natural, but I can't find metadata anywhere.

[–] Chriszz@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

was anyone else able to see the pic for what it is and then left confused looking for why it’s supposed to be confusing

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

How????

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

The bottom right is a reflection on the water of the wall at the top right.

[–] Rascabin@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

You must bend the spoon.

[–] FreshLight@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Man-made structure in the top right

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Aaaaaaah ok

[–] MacStache@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

Oh no.

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

unaltered

🤔🤥

[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yep. It's literally cropped from the original and impossible to argue it's unaltered