this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
636 points (98.3% liked)

Science Memes

16555 readers
1418 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rongbipper@lemmy.ca 46 points 2 years ago

Have this on my camera roll from 2016 lmao

[–] don@lemm.ee 27 points 2 years ago

Those moles have seen some shit.

[–] scaryjelly@lemm.ee 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Americans will use anything but the metric system.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 9 points 2 years ago

At least they tried using it this time

[–] lgmjon64@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure we used this textbook in my highschool chemistry class. Or at least it also used that illustration.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago

i distinctly recognize those weird eyes

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's clearly more than a litter of mole

[–] oce@jlai.lu 2 points 2 years ago

Is it? What if you press them down to fill the gaps?

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Okay, but how many moles of mole per mole are we talking about?

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] RobMyBot@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

And yet, no more than 1

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] perishthethought@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Wüge

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/wug

For anyone else confused about this comment. :)

[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

Wow, you guys are abstract!

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

It was a running gag in a linguistics meme page on The Other Side. I'm impressed you made the effort to research it!

[–] watersnipje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Ok but why are they naked?

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago

The real question is, why aren't they wearing proper PPE?

[–] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

Maybe they just feel more comfortable that way, don't yuck their yumm my dude!

[–] Nacktmull@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Stupid question. Why are you?

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Standardized mole.

[–] Nacktmull@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Just two? We build whole societies, you know.

[–] AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

This is a conjecture, at best.

How do I verify the beaker’s volume is actually a litre?