this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
537 points (100.0% liked)

196

18049 readers
733 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sweetcuppincakes@sh.itjust.works 115 points 2 years ago (3 children)

No borders? Guys the Dems aren't that left

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago

Also, don’t the Dems want to let girls NOT have balls? Its the Republicans who get grumpy when Trans women get gender affirming surgery.

[–] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Obama doubled the amount of border patrol agents. Which seems like a much better use of money than a wall, at least according to… the border patrol.

[–] gowan@reddthat.com 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

*The amount of border patrol doubled while Obama was in office. It might seem pedantic but it is not. Anything like this requires Congress to approve the budgetary increase which means it happened because of multiple parties not just the White House.

[–] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

Under his lead. You are being pedantic. It was part of his states goals and platform. And his party overwhelmingly voted for it.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Traditionally border patrol pushes have been failures, they get more staff but generally super underqualified and often times cartel linked. Yes it's a better use of money but training the ones we have to actually be effective is better use.

[–] gowan@reddthat.com 1 points 2 years ago

My point is more that you cannot say it is because of Obama when Congress has to sign off on it as well. It's like blaming Reagan for the tax cuts of the 80's when the Democrats controlled Congress and passed those bills.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Pretty sure that's the joke - if only the dems were as progressive as the cons make them out to be...
(that' how I took it anyway)

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 72 points 2 years ago

Don't threaten me with a good time!

[–] boot@lemmy.loungerat.io 52 points 2 years ago

tired: truck nuts

wired: girl balls

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 49 points 2 years ago

Republicans are the ones who keep trying to make those girls still have balls

But also don’t threaten me with a good time

[–] Sentinian@lemmy.one 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I normally hate the Democratics due to them being just being the lesser of two evils but I must say this makes them look great

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Yeah, the Dem leadership in the minds of Republican demagogues (but I repeat myself) are many times better than the ones in reality, always have been.

[–] Anti_Weeb_Penguin@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

That's it, i'm moving to the US right now.

[–] emerald@lemmy.place 10 points 2 years ago

I actually love that I can't tell if this is for or against the Dems

I have to assume it's supposed to be against, because nobody who actually votes Democrat thinks that's what they support

[–] Blahaj_Blast@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago

Dude! You already struck oil! No need to keep digging.

[–] GiddyGap@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

*Vote Democratic.

Vote Democrat is just bad grammar.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Democrats are one of the two parties in the US so "vote democratic" doesn't make sense. How else would you vote?

[–] GiddyGap@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Democrat is a noun. Democratic is an adjective. You can say "vote for a Democrat," but you can't say "vote Democrat" because you're referring to the Democratic Party where "Democratic" is the adjective. In that case, it would be "vote Democratic."

Republicans love to use slurs like "the Democrat Party." That's probably where you've heard it.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is just grammar nazi bullshit. Give me empirical evidence that anybody would say "Vote Democratic". It's a phrase I've never heard but I'm not American and not a native speaker. The authority lies with native speakers but not language purists who think they are better than others.

[–] GiddyGap@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Not trying to be better than anyone, and I do agree that it may not be the biggest of deals. But I'm a native speaker, and I'm just pointing out the grammar part and making people aware that it's a Republican epithet.

Here's an article about it for your enjoyment: https://www.npr.org/sections/publiceditor/2010/03/26/114585414/since-when-did-it-become-the-democrat-party

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Behaviorbabe@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

I usually do but I haven’t got my balls yet where are they

[–] BolshoyToster@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago
[–] GiddyGap@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Vote Democratic*

[–] GiddyGap@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

*Vote Democratic