this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
178 points (92.8% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

18 readers
2 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

During a recent interview, the actress also explains why she doesn't consider herself a movie star.

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

To fit with the theme of the first movie, the second movie is just the first movie again, but from a slightly different angle.

[–] A10@kerala.party 3 points 2 years ago

I Will watch it again just like I did it many times for the first movie

[–] spacedancer@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

While sequels to closed stories are usually terrible, they can actually pull off a prequel with her character getting the omega's power, before Cage came into the picture.

[–] theinspectorst@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I can see the narrative opportunity for that, but I think doing a 2nd movie that doesn't include both the stars would feel like a missed opportunity.

[–] yesdogishere@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

i think it would be nice if they had a baby and the baby turned out to be infested with an alien pathogen, and it ate everything up, and left some nice sauce to french chefs to enjoy.

[–] smokin_shinobi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The first movie wasn’t all of the comic, there’s more story left.

[–] quams69@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's a short novel, and the movie wasn't any of it

Highly recommend the book, it's incredible

[–] smokin_shinobi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’s also a manga I guess? I definitely read it in panel format and he carried a huge axe. The ending is the best part is why I even bothered to comment.

[–] richyawyingtmv@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Correct

Light novel first, then manga, then the Hollywood adaptation

The manga has the additional story

[–] MummifiedClient5000 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Titled TooEdgy2Morrow. You heard it here first.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why does everything need a sequel? That movie was great all on its own, one of the few standalone sci fi movies made in recent years. Why do we need another? Is advertising a new movie that expensive that the marketing team needs to ride some else's coattails to get results?

[–] harpuajim@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Cruise doesn't make bad movies so if they want to do a sequel then I'm all for it.

[–] tungah@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This movie definitely doesn't need a sequel. How about these hacks be creative and present us with new stories in the media format, just like they did with, I don't know, the first adaptation?

They have the talent, they have the money. Just be creative and risk a little.

That's the only reason we're talking about this movie in the first place. They took the risk, and imo, it paid off. I understand it maybe didn't do so well in the box office aspect, but look at the cult following this movie has.

Just leave this movie alone. Let's have new cool stories, please!

[–] kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't think Edge of Tomorrow is where we need to start complaining about sequels. Edge of tomorrow, with Cruise and Blunt, was really unique and fun, and I'd like to see more.

[–] tungah@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I wholeheartedly agree with your point on the actors. Would be really interesting seeing them together in other contexts/stories, though.

[–] 0933@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] harpuajim@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] 0933@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

And for the record I freaking loved Bill Paxton, in this movie and about all of his work.

[–] decadentrebel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Damn, he ain't gonna be in Edge of Tomorrow 3!

[–] gotnuffin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 1 points 2 years ago

You mean Happy Death Day 3?

[–] quams69@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

How about an actual adaptation of All You Need Is Kill instead

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

Just rewatched it yesterday. A sequel would be crap.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 1 points 2 years ago

Tom Cruise is always good, so I believe in a sequel.

Other actors, not so much.