this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
146 points (92.4% liked)

World News

48696 readers
2180 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Vladimir Putin has warned the US that if Washington deploys long-range missiles in Germany from 2026, Russia will station similar missiles within striking distance of the west.

The US will start deploying long-range fire capabilities in Germany in 2026 in an effort to demonstrate its commitment to Nato and European defence, the Washington and Germany said earlier this month.

The US’s “episodic deployments” are in preparation for longer-term stationing of such capabilities that will include SM-6, Tomahawk cruise missiles and developmental hypersonic weapons that have a longer range than current capabilities in Europe, Washington and Berlin said.

In a speech on Sunday to sailors from Russia, China, Algeria and India to mark Russian navy day in the former imperial capital of St Petersburg, Putin told the US it risked triggering a cold war-style missile crisis with the move.

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (3 children)

“We will take mirror measures to deploy, taking into account the actions of the United States, its satellites in Europe and in other regions of the world.”

Ok. Bring it on. If you threaten everyone with nuclear fire every time you have a tummy ache, no one will take you seriously. At this point I strongly doubt Russia even has functioning nukes. That’s how laughable you have become.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At this point I strongly doubt Russia even has functioning nukes.

I keep hearing this and I really hate this line. I think deploying those missiles in Germany is absolutely the right thing to do and that Russia must be countered.

But assuming none of Russia's 1710 deployed nuclear weapons work is crazy. Even if they haven't been maintained well, that's a ridiculous risk to take with that many weapons.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And even if the warheads aren't functional anymore, nobody wants to get a dirty bomb dropped on their heads. The best nuclear weapon is one that's not launched.

Still doesn't mean Russia gets to do what it wants.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

The moment any of those clear the launchpad they would trigger a retaliatory attack anyway, probably even if every single one of them blew up their own launch site, let alone failing to detonate over an intended target.

Even if only Russia suffered direct nuclear detonations, it would still result in 100+ million civilians killed, plus tens of millions more from nuclear fallout across Eastern Europe.

Brushing off nuclear war as survivable is lunacy.

[–] AllToRuleThemOne@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Dude, of course they do have those. To think they do not have them, in an arsenal of thousands, is delusional.

Russia even has functioning nukes

Imagine if this thought is in the heads of people who are really responsible for this conflict

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We really ought to just respond to all of Putin's bullshit warnings with that exact same warning, but about staying in Ukraine.

"By remaining in Ukraine, Russia risks triggering a cold war-style missile crisis!"

"If Russian forces stay in Ukraine, there will be dire consequences!"

Etc.

Feed him his own word salad and don't put any more thought into it.

[–] mindlight@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or we just ignore the clown....

I can't remember any warnings Russia has issued that has actually ended up in something real. Not even in the days before Russian troops rolled off the Ukrainian border did they dare to be honest with their intentions. The only thing they were able to do was to sucker punch Ukraine.

So right now, Russia is like an annoying little poodle that is constantly barking.

It barks is because it's afraid and knows it's weaker than the dogs around it, just like Russia.

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Putin: You better not do that US: OK (starts plans to do it) Putin: Hey! Stop that US: OK (starts to implement the plan) Putin: Hey I said stop US: I don't work for you Germany: FEUERE DIE RAKETEN AB

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 31 points 1 year ago
[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Poor uncle Poots. Got his panties in a bunch.

[–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Remember when George looked into Putin's eyes and saw his soul? Wonder what he thinks of Putin's soul these days?

[–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I definitely remember that. Must have been a scary moment for both of them.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know, maybe they each looked into the eyes of a war criminal, saw a reflection of themselves, and thought, "we can be friends. Or at least work together for mutual interests."

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] palordrolap@kbin.run 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting. Given that Bush claimed to see something, for "We understand each other" to Biden, I'm reading "As the sociopath you now know me to be, I am able to show exactly the amount of humanity to serve my purpose at any given time, and right now, you get nothing."

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 1 year ago

Whatya gonna do? Invade ukraine?

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ez. just deploy them in poland instead

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

In this case Russia is facing Germany AND the US.

I like those odds.

[–] Beaver@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who cares what he thinks. Protect Ukraine!

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Protect Europe.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like a geriatric Chihuahua.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Stop giving them reasons to, fuckwit.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 19 points 1 year ago

Well...we already lost the war for pacifism...now let's see if we win the war for peace by showing russia that it gains nothing by invading anyone.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I assume distance now only matters for speed of launch to impact before detection. Since missiles are effectively global anyway?

Striking distance of the west

Isnt that just basically having missiles stationed in russia?

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

The time between detection and impact is what makes the difference between total annihilation and very heavy losses/successful interception.

[–] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 15 points 1 year ago

Putin doesn't warn; all he does is threaten.

[–] Asayhem@lemmus.org 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

[...]Russia will station similar missiles within striking distance of the west.

Both of them?

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They will have to move one from Ukraine. And the mover is still on cooking duty.

[–] Asayhem@lemmus.org 4 points 1 year ago

If those are russian-made then one is already broken and the other one is lost somewhere. As per tradition.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Sabre going bzzzzzzzzzzzz!

But you’re not actually gonna do anything about it, Putin, because you’re a fucking coward and will only actually attack those weaker than you.

[–] Maiznieks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Yet, he sent nukes to belarus

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

More small stick diplomacy?

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

They were in violation of that treaty themselves and the US is no longer a party to it (as of 2019).

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sounds like Cuba 2.0. The deal struck was that the Soviets pull out of cuba and the US remove its missiles, quietly to save face.