this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
88 points (97.8% liked)

Astronomy

4339 readers
35 users here now

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The largest Black Hole compared to Our Solar System

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Che_Donkey@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is there a banana for scale or does Lemmy use a different model for scale? Beans?

[–] Calyhre@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think all the bananas (and beans) are already in the picture

[–] galilette@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago

Well, even the picture is in the picture..

[–] octoperson@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

And it has a density of only about 3g per cubic meter. It's not much denser than a vacuum made with a mechanical pump.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's the thing about black holes that always blows my mind. I don't understand how the larger a black hole is, the less dense that it is. In my mind, I always think of black holes as super dense objects containing so much matter in such a little space that the gravity is crazy strong. How can something so not dense be a black hole? It doesn't make sense to me!

[–] TauZero@mander.xyz 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

To be fair, the density is calculated from the event horizon, which is a somewhat arbitrary boundary. All the mass is still concentrated at the singularity which is still infinitely dense, just... a bit more so.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

Ah, I didn't realize that. I guess that's a little more terrifying. Sounds like you could pass the event horizon and not be instantly crushed, but would have no way of ever escaping. You'd just eventually get sucked into the singularity.

[–] galilette@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hiw stable is this kind of density? Is it going to shrink over time?

[–] octoperson@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not really. If more material falls in, its mass and size increases (the volume increases faster than the mass, which is why it's so unexpectedly low density in the first place), but otherwise it just sort of sits there.

Over the very long term, it will evaporate away by Hawking radiation. But that's a very very slow process. Like, long after everything else in the universe has ended.

[–] UlfKirsten@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] 6daemonbag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] atx_aquarian@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

...and thennnn??

[–] FlyingSquid@mander.xyz 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's actually smaller than I would have thought. I wouldn't have expected our solar system to even be visible in comparison.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What the hell are you talking about, that thing is beyond comprehension.

[–] RecursiveParadox@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We shouldn't downvote people when they realize they have been thinking about something the wrong way and admit it.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Did I miss something? I didn't down vote them

[–] RecursiveParadox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Not you I'm sure, but they were at 0 when I posted, so thought I'd note it.

[–] Aimhere@midwest.social 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

How big is this, in real numbers?

[–] President_Pyrus 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's technically correct.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

About 1600 AU, according to wikipedia.

[–] Treczoks@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

Lucky for us, it is to far away.