this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
537 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

63134 readers
3392 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Kids Online Safety Act is Still A Huge Danger to Our Rights Online.::Congress has resurrected the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), a bill that would increase surveillance and restrict access to information in the name of protecting children online. KOSA was introduced in 2022 but failed to gain traction, and today its authors, Sens. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and...

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EricHill78@lemmy.world 58 points 2 years ago (3 children)

What ever happened to parental responsibility?

[–] Zeron@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago

Nothing. Policy makers are just using their "think of the children" defense to constantly push more and more overreaching policy.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We gave up on parental responsibility when deregulation, deunionization and Reaganomics forced all adults into the workforce.

Now that we've driven families to dysfunction, even CWS is underbudgeted with an impacted caseload. So they'll let child abuse slide so long as the kid's not infested with lice and scabies.

[–] Haui@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 years ago

This is so tragic but actually makes sense. happens all around the world as well.

[–] Aagje_D_Vogel@feddit.nl 7 points 2 years ago

That's in the hands of the schools now. /s

[–] TheOSINTguy@sh.itjust.works 39 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If this passes I could see Tor usage and VPN uses rising. Not to also mention something like this would be hard to enforce and would face some backlash.

[–] demlet@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They plan to make VPNs illegal.

[–] DarkDiamondK@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I already sail the internet seven seas, I don't mind breaking another law

[–] demlet@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm not an expert by any stretch, but couldn't they force your ISP to just shut off your internet if you use a VPN? Maybe I don't understand how it actually works well enough.

[–] Irisos@lemmy.umainfo.live 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

They could implement restrictions to block VPN traffic. But that would be repealed as fast as it came when these very congressmen would phone angrily their district on why they can work from their million dollar home anymore.

Support: Sorry VPNs are now blocked and you cannot work remotely without them

Congressman: Who are the idiots that voted for these laws

Support: Well, you and your friends

[–] demlet@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ha, and you don't think Congress would write in an exception for them and their wealthy donors? I'm surprised anyone in the US believes fairness is on the table anymore.

[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

There's money to be made by requiring VPN companies to meet minimum requirements that few companies can actually meet or are willing to. Backdoors for example.

[–] ilmagico@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is that actually in the bill, or are you just saying this could be the next move?

[–] demlet@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

More like a next move. If I remember correctly, there was language in the TikTok bill a while back that would have effectively made using a VPN illegal. Maybe I'm misremembering that. I have no doubt there are people who want to make it happen.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Companies relay on VPN to allow remote work while protecting their IP. But maybe it’s only about VPN to/from foreign servers.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 2 years ago

Until we have free (tax-paid¹) school lunches and comprehensive child healthcare, until our kids are not commonly impoverished and skipping meals, I don't buy into protect the children bills. The federal government wants to protect plutocrats and the established hierarchy, and has not two fucks to rub together to give regarding US children.

¹ Our taxes also pay for fields of unused tanks, laser planes, and active camouflage development all of which cost way more than comprensive child welfare programs ever could. And thats before we get into fossil fuel and automotive industry subsidizes. The federal government already is spending grocery money on Funko POP and pogs.

[–] CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Kids in general are a danger to our rights.

[–] skymtf@pricefield.org 15 points 2 years ago

Whenever the feds say "protect the children" I know they are lying. This bill is dangerous and a danger to multiple communities. If it passes ID checks will become a thing, and guess what. ID checks will likely use Web Environment Integrity to verify if your OS is "secure" before allowing you to scan your ID. This bill is a fuck you to adults, Linux users, and queer people!

[–] demlet@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Save the puppies and kids!

[–] BarterClub@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What is this? Is it no longer change.org?

[–] BarterClub@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Change.org is a site to sign onto. This one sends your congress letters.