2nsfw2furious

joined 2 years ago
[–] 2nsfw2furious@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I absolutely fuckin hate this. It's almost the equivalent of YouTube removing the dislike button.

I am leaving this account behind because of this change, which is incredibly frustrating to have to do, since I had many saved posts and I already had been blocking the communities I don't like to see rather than downvoting their posts, so I have to redo all of this on a new instance.

Downvotes are an integral part of a voting system, and are especially critical in low population environments like this. I don't care how many "likes" a post has, what matters is the up/down ratio. Now lemmynsfw has lost that.

[–] 2nsfw2furious@lemmynsfw.com 31 points 1 year ago (4 children)

“Shocked, disgusted and outraged,” Bechiom alleges that she first ran out of the restaurant but then went back inside to retrieve her guacamole bowl – only to find that her manager and the other co-worker involved in the sexual encounter were vomiting.

Right in front of my salad???

[–] 2nsfw2furious@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

That's how venn diagrams work... Tieflings and dragonborn both share the "tails" section

[–] 2nsfw2furious@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 1 year ago

Linux kernel doesn't include a spell checking dictionary soooooo Linux doesn't worry about whether things are words. Your particular spellchecker doesn't seem to think linux is a word but "aspells dict on my machine doesn't consider linux a word" sounds a lot dumber (because it is pretty dumb)

[–] 2nsfw2furious@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Absolutely agreed. The equivalent of "Can't have application shortcuts, you can already find the executables in the file browser* type nonsense IMHO

I would much rather have it in two places where a user would expect it than 1 place a user wouldn't...

[–] 2nsfw2furious@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It sends a message to the 2nd party that they're not doing enough for my vote. If they want my vote, they'll have to change their policies to be more like the party I voted for.

If the losing party loses by 10,000 votes, and 10,000 people voted third party, guess what, the strategists are going to try to find a way to capture those votes.

Without those 10,000 votes for 3rd party, the 2nd party either does nothing or tries to get votes from the other side, moving their policies further toward the 1st party.

I would say in the current political climate, 3rd party voting is more important than ever. The idea that it's a vote for the other side is an absolute farce, an attempt at preventing change, and couldn't be further from the truth.

[–] 2nsfw2furious@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 1 year ago

Forcing someone to use a different form of media to get acceptable support for your product is pretty bullshit. If I can sign up for, pay for, and use your product for years without a telephone, I shouldn't suddenly be forced to use a phone to get support.

Even if that might be the best solution at this point, it's still garbage and something to justifiably complain about, especially considering it's mildly infuriating we're talking about.

[–] 2nsfw2furious@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago

wearing an AOT t-shirt is an advert

Idk what AOT is, but branded t shirts are pretty much advertisements by definition.

[–] 2nsfw2furious@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago

Lol I think you mean "sorry I misread." Imagine being that bad at context and blaming the writing. Sure I could've been more explicit but most people can handle a single ambiguous pronoun in a comment chain without writing a whole salty comment about how wrong one clearly contextually incorrect interpretation is. You're what's wrong with the liberal gun community.

[–] 2nsfw2furious@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Select fire is a weapon that can do full auto and semi auto. In other words, colloquially a full auto rifle. No AR-15s for the civilian market today are select fire or burst fire. Buying a new select fire or full auto rifle has been extremely illegal at the federal level for literal decades, as would be turning your semiautomatic into a select fire (without heavy duty federal licensing at a minimum)

Maybe you should learn the difference?

[–] 2nsfw2furious@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

AR-15 is not selective fire. That means fully automatic, something that is already effectively banned in the USA.

[–] 2nsfw2furious@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

No, it's like pushing for horse-drawn carriage control because people in cars are speeding, or like saying there's a butter-knife loophole around sword bans.

It's fucking important to know about the things you're trying to legislate, and knowing that an AR-15 isn't an assault rifle is such a basic bit of information.

view more: next ›