AGM

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] AGM@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 days ago

As far as I remember, during the BC provincial elections in the fall, Mainstreet consistently indicated the BC United (conservative) party was around 5 points ahead of the NDP in polling.

The others generally showed it to be a dead heat.

In the end, the NDP won a very close race and Mainstreet was shown to be the one overrepresenting conservative vote intentions as compared to the other pollsters.

Not sure what the differences were in their methodology, but it wouldn't surprise me to see the same thing going on here.

[–] AGM@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Chinese culture has the concept of 'eating bitterness' and it is universal. It's about being able to take the suffering, loss, pain, humiliation, and all the other bitter stuff that life can throw at you, enduring it, and building character, strength, and resilience out of it. It's a virtue. It's a universally admired trait.

North American culture is not great at eating bitterness. The culture here is more about eating sweet, or living the good life, and when people have to eat bitterness, especially those expecting to eat sweet, it is viewed as shameful and castigating rather than normal, and it easily turns a person towards grievance and a sense of injustice that makes them bitter inside instead of resilient and optimistic.

This is why I think men in North America, especially white men, have turned to characters like Jordan Peterson, or in worse cases, Andrew Tate. Jordan Peterson at least tries to help these men develop a sense of responsibility and strength that can be constructive and meaning- making. Guys like Tate, on the other hand, exploit their grievance to make them socially nihilistic. One is obviously much better than the other, but neither is a substitute for having a common social value place upon eating bitterness.

The "manosphere" gives aggrieved, frustrated, disappointed, and angry men stories to help them process their emotions, but they still rely upon self-centered and egotistical tropes like the hero's journey or misogynistic worldviews. These don't address the deeper and more universal reality that none of us (male or female) are heroes from Marvel movies, that deep, painfully-bitter experience is part of the common human journey, and that eating that bitterness with humility and without expectation of any award for being special, is a virtue that helps you develop character.

[–] AGM@lemmy.ca 34 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] AGM@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You know, people who aren't very bright can usually easily make up for that by just being diligent, such as by reading a bit more before posting. People who aren't very bright and who are committed to ignorance because it confirms their ideological biases have a much harder time figuring things out. I see that's where you're at, so you're not worth interacting with further. Hopefully you overcome that hurdle some day.

Good day.

[–] AGM@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Actually, I read several more articles about her before I posted that, because I wanted to find out more. She moved to Canada in 2014, she is apparently a PR, and she seems to love Canada. Maybe you should check your xenophobia and read more before you post something.

(https://vancouversun.com/opinion/columnists/douglas-todd-billionaire-owner-of-three-b-c-malls-bares-soul-on-china-scandals-and-her-horrific-upbringing)

[–] AGM@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago (7 children)

From what I read, she moved to Canada more than 10 years ago.

[–] AGM@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

It prevents tariffs on inputs, which lowers costs of goods sold for products sold outside the US. Goods sold into the US would still be tariffed, but if the inputs are largely from China, it would still likely be cheaper to manufacture outside the US, not pay the 125% tariffs on inputs, and deal with the lower tariff rate into the States.

I mean, if your costs on inputs are going to go up from 125% tariffs by being in the US, but you can manufacture somewhere that the US is only charging 10% tariffs, it's a strong incentive to move manufacturing to that low-tariff destination and only face a 10% tariff on what your selling.

What works for any specific company would come down to their own mix of inputs, target markets, and other factors.

[–] AGM@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago (9 children)

The funniest thing about this is, if you're a US manufacturer with a lot of inputs from China and you're selling to a global market, the smartest thing to do now is very likely going to be moving your manufacturing outside of the US.

[–] AGM@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All Trump's demands to harden the border security suddenly make sense to me. It was never about fentanyl. It was just for literally everything else after destroying America's trade relations with the world. 😂

[–] AGM@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

I miss boring Canadian politics. I have never felt a sense of a Canadian election being so consequential before. The movement that has captured the US is genuinely dangerous, and if it captures Canada too, it's going to take us fully along for the ride.

[–] AGM@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

So, it's not affecting Canada's ability to have a free and fair vote, but they leave that to very end of the article while using an earlier part of the article to platform Micheal Chong saying this is China working to get Carney elected.

They also totally neglected to include a comment from Freeland, who is the other person they say was previously targeted by the group.

That is some bad journalism in the midst of an election.

Do better, CBC.

[–] AGM@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago

It's not just X. All the big social media platforms are flooded with bot networks now. It's impossible to engage genuinely in public discourse on them with accounts you don't personally know. The well of social media is being actively poisoned every day by manipulative bad actors.

view more: next ›