It's one thing to be happy to concede your constitutional right to assemble and protections for the press to bullies with guns.
It's another to distance yourself from the brave injured journalists and blame the people with cameras for the actions of tyrants.
What does "Don’t be in a zero zone, that’s all there is to it." and "I agree with you fully." mean, if you're not endorsing someone who blames the journalists for being harmed while *checks notes* doing their job reporting on civil unrest with cameras in proximity to armed police?