JackAttack

joined 6 months ago
[–] JackAttack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 months ago

Yeah, I'm not exactly thrilled on chrome either but at a certain point I think it comes down to "who's fucking me the least". Which I totally understand it's probably still chrome but I think just like with privacy, there is no sweet spot with browsers. It's all subjective on each person's threshold and what they want/need.

Call me crazy, but an example I've been thinking about is this:

Firefox is great. But with their recent TOS addition a lot of people want to jump ship of which ive seen a lot reference forks of Firefox. If, hypothetically, mozilla followed suit and became the next google, wouldnt a lot of those forks just be getting their updates from upstream (depending on the type)? And either way, they would be gecko which is developed by mozilla. So if 10 years from now mozilla goes the data route then we could be back in the same predicament.

Of course, those forks might not add crypto or screw over creators by affiliate link highjacking so I get there's more to it then that.

But either way, I kinda look at these things like the Signal messenger argument. Is it a perfect solution? No, some people say go further because it's centralized but it does offer a great mix of security and eas of access. And I think those trade offs apply to browsers as well.

Anyways, thanks again and have a good one as well! I appreciate the discussion!

[–] JackAttack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Thanks for actually answering my question. It was a genuine question based on my opinion for what I knew.

Based on those articles, the crypto stuff doesn't necessarily worry me as much as the affiliate highjacking that they were caught doing. I wasn't aware. Honey recently got caught up In a scandle just as bad if not worse (by scale of users).

And yeah, I heard Opera was pretty terrible. I wanna say I heard the developers of themselves opera left and created Vivaldi and Opera is Chinese owned I think? I could be wrong on that.

Either way, thanks.

[–] JackAttack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Could you clarify some of these issues? I'm a long time brave user and have really enjoyed using it and haven't noticed any issues besides some if their Web 3.0 integrations that you can turn off.

Always happy to find Better options though.

[–] JackAttack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

Not sure about the whitelisting part, but I think this is what Brave already does. Randomizing fingerprinted data as opposed to blending in. Makes it hard to build a profile on.

[–] JackAttack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

I used to use Plex as well but similar to your remarks, they started doing a lot more updates that added a "corporate" feel to it such as adding their own movies/tv. Nothing inherently wrong with that but in my opinion, when a platform has the option to add features such as that, that costs money. And they're gonna want to get that money back somehow. Yeah they offer subscriptions but to me this all was a redflag that I could see them taking further in the future. Where as Jellyfin is completely free at the cost of a little extra work to setup.

[–] JackAttack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

For your first question, my guess would be its the largest fish. Proton probably has some users that harbor useful information but think about apples market dominace. It's massive. And as far as I know, proton doesn't have a business presence directly under UK jurisdiction; Apple has an enormous presence and billions in previous investments for employees and infrastructure there. Making it much easier to enforce those laws on them.

In other words, it's like living in the country versus living in another country. My home country will have a much easier time forcing laws on me than a country I'm not even living in.

I'm unable to answer your second question though. I don't know enough about legality.

[–] JackAttack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

Awesome. I'll give this a try later and get back to you. Thanks!

[–] JackAttack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Unfortunately, I say yes. And hear me out first please.

The Fediverse in my eyes should be free. Free to have instances for everyone, including those we disagree with. Because in my opinion, the right to say and think what we want is very important (absolute free speech). And unfortunately, i think that means everyone should be allowed to say what they want. HOWEVER, free speech does not mean free of consequences. The option of federating with those groups or not is up to each community and fortunately I think many would not be okay with including them.

I'm always open to hearing input as these are personal thoughts so by all means add to or let me know the errors in my thinking. Thanks!

[–] JackAttack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

Thanks for adding! Could you clarify a bit on the points so I can better understand where I was wrong at?

[–] JackAttack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 months ago

Yeah maybe Tor Browser was the better example. Just trying to get the point out lol.

[–] JackAttack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 months ago

I personally have never used them. I use Proton myself (despite some news) and haven't had any issues. I've heard Tuta is also great but I think one of the cons of privacy mail is that they're not going to be nearly as polished as the big players like Gmail or outlook.

[–] JackAttack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago

Awesome, that was my next topic to look at was shows. Thanks for clarifying!

view more: ‹ prev next ›