Problem is, the first half of your statement is dependent on the latter half. That’s not a choice for Ukraine, but a fallback strategy.
Slotos
joined 2 years ago
Letting Russia win introduces continuous genocide and forced conscription for war against EU states issue. Pick your poison.
A cargo cult doesn’t change airplanes by building mock runways - they rather miss the point entirely.
You don’t need to have kids to pass on values. The basic premise of your statement doesn’t hold up.
“No data” on Greenland is a perfect touch.
By February, Ukraine is gone. They already struggle not to win, but just to exist. European aid is not enough, and Ukraine will disappear from maps. The Baltics are next. Moldova is next. Poland is next. Georgia is next. Finland is next. Taiwan is gone. South Korea might survive, but won't ever look the same. NATO is gone. Chinese and ruzzian influence in Africa and South America will grow tenfold. There is no superpower to keep ruzzia and china and north korea and iran in check anymore. Worst, when WWIII start, you will be on the Axis side.
All of that is a win for them. They are not leftist, they are autocratic revanchists. Hurting undesirables was always more important to them than helping others or even themselves, it’s just the definition of “undesirables” that they disagree on with far right.
Most QA titles have very little to do even with QA itself. If QA doesn’t start at ideation, you’re not doing QA.
That last bit sounds like a bold “yet”, to be honest.
Stalin, too. And it was true.
Bicubus
Which angers me as a Ukrainian. Yes, circumstances are different and I despise misinformation coming from a loudly obnoxious subset of pro-Palestinian side, but Israel officials had been clearly stating genocidal intent from the early days.
When picking which genocide to support, the correct answer is „none”. But support for Israel kinda aligns with „Russia cannot lose” approach, so I guess things are consistent in that regard.
“Permaban” is the word you’re looking for.