Transform2942

joined 2 years ago
[–] Transform2942@lemmy.ml 35 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

My speculations:

  • "insecure from the start" - as in , the wallet was never that "cold"

  • with that amount of money, it's easy to imagine an "insider threat"

  • the hackers could have gotten lucky and struck right when the company was doing legitimate operations on the wallet

  • but probably it's a towering mountain of incompetence, composed of the elements above and more

[–] Transform2942@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 days ago (4 children)

What's the cure?

[–] Transform2942@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Luigi taught us how to do propaganda of the deed right:

  • no civilian casualties

  • target social mass murderer

  • that nobody likes

[–] Transform2942@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Everything you know is wrong - Weird Al?

[–] Transform2942@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 weeks ago

I'm sure the feckless controlled opposition party will jump right on this, just you wait

[–] Transform2942@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Hard to say right now. The article suggests that the banks are just trying to free up cash on their balance sheets. However, this could instead be an indication that they are looking for a "bigger fool" to take the losses. I personally think the bottom won't fall out of Xitter until the tesla share price crashes. Elon bought some time with credulous fools with the ridiculous cybercab demo, but that can't last forever. At that point I think the only question is whether SpaceX gets pulled down with all the rest of the musk ventures

[–] Transform2942@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The buzz is on because New Glenn just completed a hot fire test and is ostensibly very close to a maiden launch.

Also I'm no fan of baldy's but in rocket terms New Shepard has been a pretty effective and reliable launcher for what it does.

[–] Transform2942@lemmy.ml 42 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yes they mean don't break the law for your boss because the second anyone starts asking questions they will be extremely happy to have a scapegoat.

Instead, insist that the request be put in writing

[–] Transform2942@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 months ago

We...uhhh... suspect Russian involvement

[–] Transform2942@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 months ago

Well, being on .ml myself I would probably have the worst visibility on that but when I have seen people actually look at the mod log, it generally doesn't agree with the posters claimed rationale for the ban

[–] Transform2942@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

From your description, that certainly sounds like an uncontroversial take, I would love to see the actual post though.... Commonly people's summaries of posts that got them banned differ quite drastically from the actual post

view more: next ›