Umthisguy

When did he say they were spreading their beliefs? Didn't sound like they said anything about religion except that it was a Jesus themed party, and he didn't even know what that meant, it could have meant a lot of things.

Yeah totally understandable. Except in this case, they didn't tell him all about Jesus, they invited him to a kid's party. And they didn't ask for his opinion, nor did they give theirs.

Possibly unpopular opinion by a fellow atheist, but you're just as bad as a preaching Christian by doing that. Trying to turn others to your belief system, however right it may be, is shitty, homie. Way to ruin a kids party, when you admit yourself you didn't even know what they meant by Jesus Party. Made an assumption, ruined a kids week. YTA.

Too relatable, sadly. I'm here if you want to talk.

Add acid instead of salt. Like vinegar or lemon juice. Better flavor, healthier, and same effect. Too many people over salt it's god awful.

But how do you get that chopstick out?? There's no beginning, it's chopsticks all the way down!

I disagree, but only because I think I figured out the ending, how GRRM told the show writers, and I can see how they interpreted it.

Possible spoilers: I think Jon is supposed to kill Daenerys and the writers couldn't figure out why so they just made up dumb shit. But the reason he kills her is to forge a sword (Lightbringer) to destroy the white walkers. And Daenerys agrees to it.

"To fight the darkness, Azor Ahai needed to forge a hero's sword. He labored for thirty days and thirty nights until it was done. However, when he went to temper it in water, the sword broke. He was not one to give up easily, so he started over.

The second time he took fifty days and fifty nights to make the sword, even better than the first. To temper it this time, he captured a lion and drove the sword into its heart, but once more the steel shattered.

The third time, with a heavy heart, for he knew beforehand what he must do to finish the blade, he worked for a hundred days and nights until it was finished. This time, he called for his wife, Nissa Nissa, and asked her to bare her breast. He drove his sword into her living heart, her soul combining with the steel of the sword, creating the weapon known as Lightbringer." -Tyrion tells this story in book 2 I believe

"According to prophecy, our champion will be reborn to wake dragons from stone and reforge the great sword Lightbringer that defeated the darkness those thousands of years ago. If the old tales are true, a terrible weapon forged with a loving wife's heart. Part of me thinks man was well rid of it, but great power requires great sacrifice. That much at least the Lord of Light is clear on." -Book 2

A restaurant isn't a public space. It's privately owned and you are paying to be there.

Seriously. Like not voting is going to help more.

Ah ok, I see. Well I want to be clear, if someone is interested in reading, don't be deterred by this, make your own opinion. My wife and I loved every book. I really liked Amos' trajectory especially.

To touch on how I interpreted your points in the story (CONTAINS SPOILERS AND I DON'T KNOW HOW TO HIDE THEM):

-It pointed out the higher dimension beings couldn't actually pinpoint anything in our spacetime unless a huge amount of energy was released at the exact moment we crossed their dimension through the gates. -It seemed to me that everyone was scared of duarte and even more scared of modifying themselves with protomolecule after his "coma" where he killed someone instantly. -I think I remember the Laconians basically being arrogant and underestimating everyone.

I hear that you have a different opinion and maybe you got burnt out on the books, but I really hope the show finishes them up because I enjoyed them.

What didn't you like about them?

I guess people really can't have this conversation without it being super emotionally charged. I mean, you can kill a person with a bow too, I don't think that's really a viable solution, it's also a dangerous weapon. Anything you use to easily kill an animal can be used against humans, and arguably should be regulated too. And not everyone has the land, money, and resources to raise their own domestic animals for food.

Insulting people who want to ethically eat meat and anyone who owns a gun is what your going for here, but I don't see where the "snowflake" remark comes in. It's a big jump to say someone who wants to hunt to avoid factory farming has their entire personality built around it and to minimize their attempt at ethical food consumption by calling it a "hobby". And saying "fuck all everyone who does X" is usually a pretty unhelpfully broad generalization that lacks scrutiny. You're using the "attacking someone's character" fallacy.

Renting a weapon to hunt seems like a decent solution, but who is qualified to rent or safekeep the weapons? Then they're just in someone elses hands. What criteria do we use to judge who's capable of renting them out?

My point is it's a complex issue, and anyone who says it's so easily solved by doing "this one thing" isn't considering every angle.