and people complain about wayland.
The Idea is that the enum acts as a union, capable of holding any of the member types, It's not that different from using identifiers and when transpiling to rust I will probably only support variants beginning with string literals (or maybe generate them).
The main reason is that I could use type inference to define the variants in a returned anonymous enum.
I like the pipe symbol because it is useful for distinguishing between enums and structs without keywords. And I just personally think it looks better. And allow for pretty anonymous enums like (|String |Int)
for something that can accept both a string and an integer.
Not having a license is "All Rights Reserved". That's why I bothered with the license section in the readme at all.
Thanks!
I intend for the language to have a similar borrow checker and type system. Which is why I'm targeting rust. It means I have something to check against when writing the tooling. (Although I'm not sure I'll get that far. My computer is littered with dead projects).
I don't really want to clutter the repo with something so frivolous. If they were links or an SPDX ID would that be enough?
I'm intending to use this for a custom language "OA" that I want to compile to Rust and JS to start with.
I don't know enough about LLVM to compile directly to machine code although I would like to.
Isn't this the source for the relay? https://github.com/bluesky-social/indigo/tree/main/cmd/bigsky
And even then the readme says:
A note and reminder about Relays in general are that they are more of a convenience in the protocol than a hard requirement. The "firehose" API is the exact same on the PDS and on a Relay. Any service which subscribes to the Relay could instead connect to one or more PDS instances directly.
And the PDS source code is here: https://github.com/bluesky-social/pds
EDIT: The PDS source is actually here: https://github.com/bluesky-social/atproto/tree/main/packages/pds the other link is for self hosting.
No you weren't. At least not in my opinion. I was just continuing the thought not refuting anything you said.
You think the election posts were low quality? I was going more of a clean minimalist vibe instead. Got any tips?
I guess you could see it that way. Just the "opinion rather than relevancy" sounds so appropriate to the downvote topic that I assumed it was that.
Was inspired by the article to draw this. Sadly It doesn't make much sense without context.