Yes, but I wouldn't bother bringing it up to them. It's fine if they want to provide it under multiple licenses. Since they make it available under the GPL, you can do those things under that license.
If they do change something, it will probably be to change the license away from GPL.
Being a YouTube personality is enough justification for me.
Ohhh. The headline made it sound like people who get tattoos make poor decisions.
I don't think you've looked closely enough at China, then.
Probably not. I expect once the cases advance, SCOTUS will pick it up again fairly soon.
Oh, in practice it's been dead for decades.
No. The core issue has not been decided. When courts in one state rule differently from courts in another, it goes up to federal court. When federal courts in different circuits rule differently, it goes up to SCOTUS. This issue isn't at that point just yet.
If it worked well before, what changed?
There's a first time for everything. And we've had a lot of firsts recently.
"I don't know how to run a shop, but it can't be that hard, let's just have AI do it!"
For a first pass, yes. I wouldn't really trust it for an unbiased, objective perspective. Each model is only as good as its training data.
What are you trying to accomplish by using a VPN?