dino

joined 2 years ago
[โ€“] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Don't use github/gitlab for small private repositories! use codeberg.org if you are not a developer. If you are in need for a big more jazz and looking at self-hosting go for forgejo.

[โ€“] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Windows people don't even know what git is, let alone version control. ๐Ÿ˜œ

[โ€“] dino@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 3 days ago

But dare you something doesn't work as expected under plasma. Trying to figure out what causes the issue is a daunting task. Also you mentioned windows rules much, did you mean you prefer windows rules from plasma to tiling? Because setting up windows rules for all your applications is AT LEAST as bothersome as it is in any of the twms I tried/use (i3wm, river) or WMs like labwc.

[โ€“] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Runit specific bs? You mean being simple and sane? lol And yes reading documentation is true for both. Also be aware of context.

[โ€“] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago

I think their documentation is pretty solid, for everything else the reddit/internet searches can solve it. But as with EVERY DISTRO on this planet, the archwiki can be applied! You just need to know what are the differences from void to arch. (no systemd for example)

[โ€“] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Wait, immutable distribution don't have a packet manager? But you can still install flatpaks?

[โ€“] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I am not a newbie and wouldn't even know how to do it without using a manual (archwiki)

[โ€“] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Or Void Linux.

[โ€“] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 days ago

Very bad post. And Tumbleweed has OBS (Open Build Systems), although I dont even know if that is the right name for its AUR equivalent.

[โ€“] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

Gamescope is so unreliable, doesn't work properly with Hunt 1896

[โ€“] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago

Why? Solus is still going strong, so is budgie?

[โ€“] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago

Its one of the most interesting distribution projects in the last 5 years? So if you are interested in it, check if you have some spare coins and support them.

55
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by dino@discuss.tchncs.de to c/gaming@beehaw.org
 

So yeah, I want to discuss or point out why I think Valve needs to fix Anti-Cheat issues. They have VAC but apparently its doing jackshit, be it Counter Strike 2 (any previous iterations) or something like Hunt: Showdown the prevalence of cheating players is non deniable. For me personally it has come to a point that I am not enjoying playing those games anymore, although they are great games by itself. But the amount of occurrences being killed or playing against cheaters is at a height, where I don't see the point anymore.

  • Why I think Valve is the only company able to something against cheaters?

Because they have the tools with VAC already aiming to prevent cheaters. Valve has got the resources to actually invest into something more profound which could be used for any game where anti-cheat protection needs to be implemented. And lastly Valve is the company which is interested in furthering the ability to gaming on Linux, the anti-cheat solution needs to work on both operating systems. Only Valve has the motivation and means to achieve that with their knowledge and resources. What do you guys think about the topic? Is the fight against cheaters hopeless? Do you think some other entity should provide anti-cheat protection, why? I skimmed over "anti cheat in linux kernel" posts in the net, but I have very little knowledge about the topic, what is your stance on it?

Edited: Mixed EAC with VAC. EAC seems to be part of Epic Company. Both of these tools seem unable to prevent cheating like mentioned above.

view more: next โ€บ