Young me got that lesson when trying to play ARMA 2 on a 5400RPM HDD. It would run 60FPS if I didn't move but as soon as I started moving the game started stuttering. When I installed it on a 7200RPM HDD the game no longer had any performance issues.
It all comes down to what specs the game was designed for and I imagine most modern open world games are designed for SSD-s. Putting them on HDDs will absolutely have a negative effect.
Let me spell it out for you : F U C K O F F T H E N. it's not a hard concept to get. Even for your pickled brain. You are part of the problem and you get no saying who develops plattforms run instances or where people spend their salaries.
As I've already told you twice, I have. I wonder how many times do I need to tell you that until you finally get it.
Just like i can't ban you as much as I would like to, even fascists that haven't been kicked down a flight of stairs or not can run .world and other instances were they promote genocide and ban any opposing views. Without mine or any other person's say so.
If you were an instance owner you could ban me from your instance. That is something Dessalines has done to multiple people who oppose and call out the fucked up shit happening on lemmi.ml. And nobody gets a say in that matter. That is part of the criticism people have towards lemmy.ml. Funny how once again you understand the issue people have but refuse to apply it critically because your tankie buddies are the ones being criticized. Hypocrite much?
Thanks to the devs of Lemmy.
I'm supposed to be thankful that they didn't add such a massive tool of oppression into Lemmy? Was that even a possibility? Do you think that little of Lemmy devs that you think they could've done this but chose not to?
Again not a hard concept to get but I see it might be extra hard for a liberal not to be able to set the rules for everyone else, authoritarian as you are.
Funny how you think a socialist wouldn't have an issue with the subject matter at hand. I guess you're one of those "if you're not a Leninist you're not a socialist" kind of people. Fair enough, I don't think highly of you either.
So you can understand why people would have issues with fascists running the show but you can't understand why people have issue with someone doing the same shit fascists would do?
I guess that does require a certain level of nuance that you've clearly shown to lack so I'm not really surprised how the entire concept just goes over your head.
My bad. For some reason I associate all the consent pop-ups with GDPR as I don't remember any pop-ups prior to GDPR.
That's also not entirely correct.
you've never had to ask for permission to store cookies that are required for your site to work
You don't need to ask permission for cookies that are strictly necessary for your site to work. They can contain personally identifiable information (PII) but only to the extent that is strictly required for the functionality to work. If your "required" cookie does anything more than what is strictly necessary (such as collecting more PII than it needs or has built in tracking) you need to ask consent.
you have to ask for permission for third party trackers to store cookies when people use your site.
If you're using something like on premise tracking, like Matomo, then you still have to ask permission. There are some exceptions like if you don't use cookies and you don't track PII.
And just for extra clarification, if you are collecting PII (for example into logs) you need to ask permission even when you're not storing any cookies.
Actually they do. They can't just process your data without your consent. The exceptions where they can process your data without consent are (at least to my knowledge) legal obligation (for example processing your income to calculate your taxes) and public interest (for example doing statistics on households), both requiring some legal work before actually being allowed to be used without your consent.
Technically they can do so that they don't have to care about GDPR but then it also has to become public knowledge that they don't want to care about GDPR and it becomes the responsibility of the citizens to oppose such moves.
EDIT: Forgot to add that in this case it most likely would become part of the law so yeah, they wouldn't have to care about GDPR in this circumstance.
In the realm of turn based combat it's pretty good. It has pretty easy to understand skills and mechanics that make it easy to pick up, but then you also get tons of modifiers (pictos and lumina) where the combinations can significantly alter how your character plays. And the timed triggers removes probably the worst aspect of turn based combat, the passivity. You can't just sit there and wait while your character does a thing and then the enemy does a thing. You have to time your attacks but more importantly you have to identify what attack your enemy will do so you'd know if you need to dodge, parry, jump or gradient counter and then also time them correctly. It's far more engaging than your average turn based combat.
The mediocre part of the gameplay are the side activities usually related to gestrals. I'm gonna vent now because my experience popped into my mind and it pissed me off again. Nothing infuriated me more than that stupid beach volley ball. Thank you for putting a fixed camera at an angle where it's really hard to see the middle gestral throw and also your position in relation to where the gestral is going to land. The amount of times I lost the hard volley ball because I couldn't see the middle gestral until it was too late really made me question how this even passed QA. And the reason I couldn't just focus on the middle gestrals was because I had to focus on making sure my attack would actually connect with the gestral. The marker on the ground is just purely decorative as I had multiple occasions where I would attack squarely on the marker only for the gestral to still land and take a point away. AND FOR THE LOVE OF SOPHIE DO NOT THROW OUT GESTRALS FASTER THAN I CAN ATTACK. I almost beat the hardest volley ball match, except I didn't beat it because I literally could not attack fast enough to send back the last gestral. I would just sit there, in perfect position, punching the attack button like a maniac and then watching how the gestral lands on the ground because the attack simply would not happen. Fuck beach volley. End of rant. Actually no, fuck beach volley again stupid fucking minigame. Now it's over.
TLDR: gameplay good.
PHP is hardly doomed. It's still getting new releases (last one being 19 days ago) and it's still relatively popular for web development, which means it's going to be support for quite a while. The rest what you've said about PHP is more or less just your opinion. As for Rust, Rust is a good language but Rust isn't very popular at this moment and it's even less popular when it comes to web development because most of the things that make Rust great are things that are simply not that important for web development. Most web development languages are performant enough, rust being even more performant isn't going to be noticed. And because social media sites aren't exactly security-critical Rust being memory safe won't play a big role. The only clear benefit Rust has over PHP is being strongly typed.
But there's a very obvious benefit to PHP. You simply develop faster. If you had 2 identical web projects, one in PHP and one in Rust, and you were equally skilled in both languages you'd finish the PHP project faster because PHP is literally designed for web development. Speed is a much bigger factor when developing a Reddit style content aggregator site.
As for the second point. You have an issue with fragmentation, but your solution to Lemmy devs refusing to cooperate is fragmentation? People forking Lemmy will also lead to fragmentation. Fragmentation is bad, but eventually people will gravitate towards one solution and fragmentation gets solved. It there's very little different between the fragmentation happening between Lemmy forks or Lemmy and Mbin. IMO fragmentation is inevitable and I would rather see it happen right now rather than sit through N different Lemmy dramas until everyone gets so fed up with Lemmy devs that Lemmy gets forked and the fork becomes more popular than Lemmy.
But they usually aren't big babies making demands and throwing tantrums on those projects.
I'm pretty sure if some other controversial dev at some other FOSS project came out and said "I need money to continue developing" there would also be people "making demands and throwing tantrums", because people generally don't want to support assholes. The people throwing actual tantrums are people jumping on their high horse going "Oh, you don't want to support an asshole. What a freeloader you are."
Since you're arguing that we shouldn't take their politics into account tell me, would you defend them just as vehemently if they were fascists and ran a fascist instance? Or do you make that argument only because your own political views align with them? Because despite clearly different ideological views their actions and support aren't that far from fascists. Fascists peddle in propaganda, censorship and revisionism. lemmy.ml regularly does propaganda, revisionism and censorship (with one of the main devs being the one doing the censoring). Fascist need an outside group to direct anger at. Lemmy.ml has established "the west" as the outside group to be angry at. And obviously both have a clear affinity towards authoritarianism. We're only missing terror and cult of personality (And I'm sure this one isn't far off if it's not already present but not apparent). So would you defend them if they were fascists?
My original wild prediction was that Hitech would take over Alpine F1 team in 2026 and Oakes puts Paul Aron in one seat and the other seat would've gone to the driver who did better this year, so probably Gasly. But I found it odd why they'd bring in Briatore if the team would go to Hitech. I guess I got my answer.
I have no idea what the plan is for Alpine now, except that Doohan is definitely getting kicked for Colapinto, Aron ain't getting a seat and Gasly has a lifeline until Briatore finds someone more southern to replace him. I liked my original prediction more but there is a positive here. At least I have a team to hate-watch because I'm definitely not going to cheer for that old codger.
We want FOSS federated social media and people have jumped ship to Lemmy because it was the most developed at that point. But I will keep reminding people that Lemmy isn't the only option we have. I jumped from Lemmy to Mbin because I can no longer tolerate how Lemmy devs act and IMO anyone feeling the same way should also jump ship. Lemmy devs don't own the activitypub and Mbin can federate with Lemmy communities. You can continue using the fediverse as you've been using it on Lemmy, until hopefully in the future communities also start migrating to Mbin (and all the tankies can stay in Lemmy). If you don't like the state of Lemmy, be the change you want to see.
Also worth pointing out that this kind of drama won't happen with Mbin because the project is community maintained not individually maintained.
I've been saying it for the last decade, there's no real "games are too expensive to make" problem. There's only studios choosing the "go big or go home" death spiral where they inflate the budget and need a hit to stay afloat. But then after every hit the budget grows even bigger requiring an even bigger hit until eventually they're going to flop and the studio goes under. They could just not do that and have a sustainable business. And I get that it's not only the game developers fault. Part of the blame falls on the publishers who most likely force budgets to balloon so they could make more money (if the game is a success). But when I say they could just not do that I mean both the developer and publisher. Both of them should be smarter than that.
But clearly even with all the major flops it has been a successful strategy, because they've been at it since at least mid 2000s. It's only in the recent years where it's really starting to strain all the AAA publishers as the budgets have grown too big even for them. These price increases are an outcome of this budget ballooning. They're feeling their bottom line taking a hit so they increase the price to mitigate the risk.
Personally I said fuck them, let it crash and let's get more studios like Sandfall, who made an exceptional games for a reasonable price.