What are you talking about?
My position is that I’m surprised by the rule of the law, as you can apparently both be a monopoly, and have (better) products in the same field, easily available, simply because people don’t care to learn alternatives
Why does this surprise you?
2
not sure I really agree with Stoller on this piece but worth sparking conversation
(www.thebignewsletter.com)
Aoc can't run for president yet.
Y'all are why people hate the fediverse.
This is a case where it seems the elite consensus drove a change in culture whereas the gay marriage thing seems to have only happened once it became a norm across society.
What's the context?
This argument is pointless. Neither of you is right. Arguing for or against optics is pointless.
This argument is pointless. Neither of you is right. Arguing for or against optics is pointless.
You can skip it. It's a free article, just has a nag screen.
Monopoly doesn't refer to literally a single seller. It's used to refer to disproportionate market power.