jcarax

Ok, so the resolv.conf is being used to put systemd-resolved in the forwarding path, with it listening on 127.0.0.53. That's how Mint does things, so don't touch that file.

Your resolved.conf has no DNS servers or fallback DNS servers configured, so it should just use the DNS servers handed out by DHCP. Either your DHCP servers isn't handing out a DNS server (unlikely, since other machines work), NetworkManager was configured to not use DHCP DNS servers, or you're hitting some bug causing the same. I suspect you may have configured NetworkManager for this, maybe it was overriding the VPN DNS. Or maybe you accidentally set the NetworkManager DNS backend to dnsmasq, when it should be systemd-resolved in Mint.

You could try uncommenting that FallbackDNS line and adding a couple space separated DNS servers, maybe your router IP. Mine looks like this:

#DNS= FallbackDNS=1.1.1.1 1.0.0.1 #Domains=

That will hopefully allow VPN DNS to work when it's connected, and fall back to other DNS servers when not. If not, we could try taking a look at NetworkManager configs. It's been a bit, I use systemd-networkd now, but I could spin up a VM.

I think they care about their customers just about as much as they care about making money, and aside from GOG, the competition simply does not. It's a pretty good demonstration to how capitalism has failed us, to be honest, because any of those competitors would have been able to compete if they hadn't treated their customers like shit.

If you wanted to, you could post your /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/systemd/resolved.conf here. I don't know if there might be a configuration directory option for systemd-resolved, so keep an eye out for a potential directory like /etc/systemd/resolved.d that might have the configs instead.

Uhm... interesting hyperbole during a time where America is literally facing down a fascist dictator.

Did you ever come back to this and figure it out? My curiosity is killing me :)

And I think it's probably not in resolv.conf, that's a stub that kind of redirects things to systemd-resolved. So I think it's in the forwarder config of that.

Be careful, I was just looking over the Arch docs I linked you to, and I think the configs have changed substantially in the last few months. There's a good chance that the configs in Mint look substantially different.

Agreed, though I don't think they disabled systemd-resolved, because it still works using 127.0.0.53 when they're connected to the VPN. So the daemon must be running, unless Mullvad itself has a DNS forwarder using the same loopback. I suspect they either hard coded some upstream DNS server for Mullvad, because Mullvad might not have supported systemd-resolved yet. Or maybe they set a permission on the configs, and something changed with the user context of Mullvad processes.

Interesting that it works when the VPN is connected, though. I also believe that systemd-resolved is installed on just about any system using systemd, but often isn't enabled, without problem. Enabling it would generally involve a resolv.conf symlink and a config, so maybe that config was hijacked by Mullvad (or OP configuring Mullvad), and there's no upstream DNS server available when the VPN isn't connected.

I missed that it's Linux Mint in the original post, and it looks like Mint has started using systemd-resolved. The Arch wiki might be useful to OP on how things are configured:

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Systemd-resolved

Ok, so something setup 127.0.0.53 as your DNS server, and isn't removing it correctly. I think it's safe to say it's Mullvad, since it works using that DNS server IP when connected. Is that IP in your resolv.conf, or is resolv.conf maybe a stub, and you're using systemd-resolved?

Ok, so does the VPN bring it's own DNS? Some VPNs do, so it may explain why everything suddenly works fine when you connect.

When not connected to VPN, are you able to dig or nslookup internet names? Local names? A server timeout will be very different from an nxdomain or an empty SOA, in the response.

Are you able to telnet to a public web server on TCP/443?

One thought I'm having is, maybe at some point you set a static IP on your wifi interface, but screwed up the subnetting.

Have you ever messed with network manager or systemd-resolved internal settings, maybe trying to setup multicast DNS or caching?

I've been using Thinkpads since the X61s, and used the trackpoint extensively back in the day. Hell, I had the X61s that didn't even have a ~~trackpoint~~(edit: didn't have a trackpad), and I rarely used a mouse with it.

But I really don't understand how anyone still uses the thing extensively. Once in awhile I'll use it for some bit of specific precision work when I don't have a mouse handy. I feel like the Trackpoint quality has gone down significantly over the years, and stuff like anti-drift seems to have been neglected.

If not for the horrible arrow keys that I already hate on my Macbook Air, I was all for this transition. I'd much rather have a great trackpad at this point. I want something more compact than a Framework, and I'm comfortable with Lenovo's Linux support at this point.

Honestly, I never really use it untethered enough to give you a good answer. But I can say that notebookcheck's battery tests are pretty good, and they test enough laptops to compare well across a large number of models and generations.