overview for keksbaecker

Stealth rule change announced in the Foundations mechanics article: no more choosing blocker order in c/mtg@mtgzone.com

[–] keksbaecker@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Deciding on how to assign the damage without the defending player being able to intervene seems okay to me, but I am really confused why they removed the requirement to assign lethal damage.

But maybe I have, you know … plans and would rather deal 3 damage to the 6/6 and 2 damage to the 4/4. That's okay, too.

This really feels unnecessary to me.

Project that rates Big tech EULA's in c/technology@lemmy.world

[–] keksbaecker@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

Terms of Service; Didn’t read does that, but I don‘t know if it is the one that was shared previously.

Review Please in c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

[–] keksbaecker@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This response is so true and so sad.

Gimme your best Enchantress commander ideas in c/mtg@mtgzone.com

[–] keksbaecker@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Sythis is a safe bet when it comes to an enchantress commander.

Calix is a good card for the 99 for sythis, but you can also always use him as the commander.

One that I haven’t played myself, but that takes a different approach to an enchantress commander is Eriette.