lvxferre

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 points 4 days ago

But I suspect allowing AI would allow pollution from commercial to non-commercial.

That's possible. Thinking on it, maybe you're right and we need walls against both. Even then I think the main issue is commerce, not AI itself.

could you make a network of, eg, .net/.org (non commercial) sites?

My take would be a federation of simple web pages, using a new markup format (more complex than gemtext, but still way simpler than HTML+CSS), and where people were collectively able to kick hostile entities out. I'm not sure on how to do it, though, specially in a way that wouldn't be weak against Sybil attacks.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 5 points 4 days ago

No, it’s just you.

I am clearly talking on general grounds ("humans"), not about any specific individual (like myself, or anyone else).

All my content is CC BY-SA. I don’t care if its reshared or who reshares it

Unless you were able to show that your approach is so typical that it contradicts my claim (you weren't), sharing what you personally do is simply attention seeking.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

"Don't kill me"? You will not be spared! /jk

Serious now: IMO the wall we need isn't against AI itself but against corporations. Once you take commercialisation out of the equation, generative models stop being a big negative to become either a non-issue or a small positive.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 15 points 5 days ago (3 children)

People talking about dead internet usually focus on the larger amount of machine content. I'll focus on the opposite:

I have no data to back this up, but I think AI made humans share less worthwhile content with each other.

Let's say you're a decent writer or visual artist. And you used to share bits of your content on the net, for free. You got some people to smile; you like it, right? "Wow thanks this is awesome ♥" fills you with good feelings. And there was no reasonable way to misuse your content for commercial purposes - you aren't a charity; you're fine playing dove if others are doves, but not if there are nearby hawks.

Now, they're making a commercial product out of your content, without your permission. That product makes some people screech how AI will replace useless trash like you - you'll become obsolete, Soon®. Social media feels as fake as a three euros bill, due to the sheer amount of bots, so you don't even care about the people (are they actual people?) who might be sharing it any more. You'd think twice before sharing your content online for free. Why bother? If you're really good you might gatekeep your content behind a paywall, otherwise you'll simply do something else.

In other words: in the internet, there used to be an implicit social agreement, roughly "share it for free, others are doing the same, everyone benefits from it, including you". And those megacorporations feeding your content into their models abused this social agreement so much people aren't as eager to play along it any more.

And the worst part? This isn't even an intrinsic issue of the technology itself. It's all about how who controls it.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For those that aren’t sure if you have fiber, the fiber will literally run into your “modem” (your Optical Network Terminal or ONT) and it will be incredibly clear that you have fiber. The wire is incredibly thin and they will warn you about bending it too much.

And if the connector breaks, you can't simply fix it at home like you would do with copper. You'll spend an internet-less weekend until the technician fixes it.

Source: got this shit happening with me this month. On a lighter side the work piled up disappeared real fast!

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Fenrir: "Dungeon nao?" MC: "Nope!"
Dora-chan: "Dungeon nao?" MC: "Nope!"
Sui: "Dungeon nao?" MC: "Yes, yes. Dungeon now."

That's blatantly preferential treatment!

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 57 points 1 week ago

It contains NSFW content, it gets tagged as such.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's possibly sarcasm, but I wouldn't count on that given it's HN.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

My bad, edition error - I initially wrote "AI"*, but then ~~because translating drunk what you often say is a PITA~~ for some reason replaced it with "AGI". Thanks for pointing it out, I'll fix it.

I agree the current lack of truly intelligent systems is a good thing.

*as in, the generic label used nowadays towards those systems, regardless of being actually intelligent or not.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

No shit.

As I often joke: the only people who genuinely believe ~~AGI~~ AI is intelligent now or soon are the ones lacking themselves intelligence.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

This reminds me a bunch of dumb jokes in Portuguese between "RAM" and "rã" toad. Including questions about "memória sapo" (toad memory).

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 8 points 2 weeks ago

I'm surprised the best strategy wasn't the neutral prompt, due to removal of any fluff.

 

Based on

SVG source for anyone willing to give it a try. Made with Inkscape. The emojis were added as images because Inkscape.

 

It's a 10m papyrus scroll from Herculaneum, one of the cities buried by Vesuvius' volcanic ash in 79 CE. It's fully carbonised but they're using a synchrotron to create a 3D model of the scroll without damaging it. Then they're using AI (pattern recognition AI, perhaps?) to detect signs of ink, so they can reconstruct the text itself.

The project lead Stephen Parson claims that they're confident that they "will be able to read pretty much the whole scroll in its entirety". And so far it seems to be a work of philosophy.

 
 

In case anyone wonders about the star:

what you type what you get
=
* 💢
$
<
>
@
 

1.6 introduced two amazing features to make mad money from fishing.

Pic related - it's the first Summer, I didn't ship all the fish (I couldn't smoke all of them in time), and I'm making 20kg/day, even being bad at fishing.

The bait maker is unlocked by Fishing Lv6. It requires 3 iron bars, 3 coral, 1 sea urchin. You put a fish there, and get 5~10 pieces of bait targetting that fish.

But why would you waste fish to get more fish, instead of using bug meat for the bait? Because you can target the most lucrative fish - like I did with sturgeon there, if I used normal bait I'd be getting carps instead.

Then there's the fish smoker. The recipe is from Willy's and it costs 10kg. You need 10 hardwood, 1 river jelly, 1 sea jelly, 1 cave jelly.

The river and sea jellies are not a big deal to get. The hardwood will likely require luck in the mines or an upgraded axe. Cave jelly is a pain, you need to fish in the mines for a while. (Ideally at Lv100, but Lv20 does the trick.)

But oh wow. It's worth. It doubles the price of the fish, but it keeps quality. Check the iridium quality sturgeon, it's 1200g! Lucrative fish tend to be unruly, but if you fish at good spots you can reliably get gold quality fish; 1.5 from gold quality * 1.5 from angler profession * 2.0 from smoking = 4.5 times the original price.

It does require coal but once you got the cash rolling you can buy it from Clint, that's what I'm doing.

 

[Idea] If you don't want to see huge flags taking space over actual drawings in the Canvas, pick the biggest flag that you can find to deface.

As long as a lot of people are doing that, the ones templating larger flags will be forced to reduce their layouts and give more room for actual drawings.


[Reasoning] When it comes to country flags, I think that the immense majority of the users can be split into four groups:

  1. The ones who don't want to see country flags at all.
  2. The ones who are OK with smaller flags, but don't want to see larger ones.
  3. The ones who want to see a specific large flag taking a huge chunk of space.
  4. The ones who want to see the whole canvas burning, like the void.

I'm myself firmly rooted into #1, but this idea is a compromise between #1, #2 and #4.

Typically #3 uses numbers (and/or bots) to seize a huge chunk of the canvas to their flags. Well, let's use numbers against it then. As long as #1, #2 and #4 are trying to wreck the same flag, we win.


[inb4]

But what about identity flags?

Not a problem. They're typically bands instead of thick squares, and people drawing them are fairly accommodating.

But what about [insert another thing]

Even if [thing] is a problem, it's probably minor in comparison with huge country flags.

What should be the template?

None. We don't need one, as long as everyone is working against the same large flag.

Just draw something of your choice over the flag, preferably over its iconic features.

But I'm not creative enough for that!

No matter how shitty your drawing is, it's probably still way more original than a country flag. So don't feel discouraged.

That said, you can always help someone else with their drawing. Or plop in some text. Or just void.

Why are you posting this now, you bloody Slowpoke?

I wish that I thought about this before Canvas 2024. But better later than never. (And better early by a year for Canvas 2025.)


EDIT: addressing on general grounds some whining from group #3 (the ones who want to see a specific large flag taking a huge chunk of the canvas space).

You do realise that this sort of "war against the largest flag" should benefit even you, as long as the biggest flag is not the one you're working with, right? Even for you, this makes the canvas a more even level field. Let us not forget that you love to cover other flags with your own.

 

I'm sharing this here mostly due to the alphabet. The relevant region (Tartessos) would be roughly what's today the western parts of Andalucia, plus the Algarve.

Here are the news in Spanish, for anyone interested.

The number of letters is specially relevant for me - 32 letters. The writing system is a redundant alphabet, where you use different graphemes for the stops, depending on the next vowel; and it was likely made for a language with five vowels, so you had five letters for /p/, five for /t/, five for /k/. Counting the "bare" vowels this yields 20 letters; /m n s r l/ fit well with that phonology, but what about the other seven?

 
 

I got a weird problem involving both of my cats (Siegfrieda, to the left; Kika, to the right).

Kika is rather particular about having her own litterbox(es), and refuses to use a litterbox shared by another cat. Frieda on the other hand is adept to the "if I fits, I sits, I shits" philosophy, and is totally OK sharing litterboxes.

That creates a problem: no matter if properly and regularly cleaned, the only one using litterboxes here is Frieda. We had, like, five of them at once; and Kika would still rather do her business on the patio.

How do I either teach Kika "it's fine to share a litterbox", or teach Siegfrieda "that's Kika's litterbox, leave it alone"?

 

Context: my mum got some keikis of this orchid from a neighbour. She managed to grow them into a full plant, it even flowered (as per pic), but she has no idea on which species of orchid it is.

I am not sure if it's a native species here (I'm in the subtropical parts of South America), but it seems to be growing just fine indoors in a Cfb climate.

Disregard the vase saying "phal azul" (blue phal), it used to belong to another orchid; it doesn't seem to be a Phalaenopsis.

If necessary I can provide further pics, but note that it has lost the flowers already.

Any idea?


EDIT: thanks to @jerry@fedia.io's comment, we could find it - it's a Miltoniopsis. Likely from Colombia or Ecuador, not from my area.

 

I feel slightly offended. Because it's true.

(Alt text: "Do you feel like the answer depends on whether you're currently in the hole, versus when you refer to the events later after you get out? Assuming you get out.")

xkcd source

view more: ‹ prev next ›