mindbleach

joined 2 years ago

Things are good because we do them!

Why should we do a thing that's completely unrelated to the question being asked?

Incorrect.

What Epic means by "for developers," is... developers keep more of the money. Walk me through how that, specifically, is bad for you.

I am not interested in general attacks against Epic. I make no general defense of Epic. Fortnite's business model should be illegal. But what you're doing is bad argumentation. You're reaching for ways to say 'Epic bad' as if that's gotta be relevant. As if attacking Epic in general constitutes a defense of one specific thing Valve does. As if promoting Valve in general means this one specific thing can't be wrong.

As for indie support - Valve doesn't need to push big games on their store, because they have a monopoly. There is no sense telling people 'if you're gonna buy it on PC, buy it on Steam!,' because of course you will. Indie games 'don't make Epic money' because Alan fucking Wake barely makes them money. Their market share is garbage. Steam has the freedom and the incentive to push more game sales, of any kind, and there's a lot more little games than big ones.

None of what Valve is doing would suddenly disappear if they took only one-quarter of gross revenue. Or a fifth. Or less. They're shaving straight off the top for nearly the entire PC gaming market. Their war-chest is ridiculous. They have such a "petro curse" that they briefly forgot to make games. Yet they treat the studios that make them all of their money the same way Nintendo and Sony squeeze console developers.

Would criticizing this specific cut be easier, if we talked about Apple's iron grip on the App Store? Because it's the same damn policy. Feel free to talk shit about when Apple does it, if you insist on judging whole entities instead of what they do.

Alan Alda famously met his wife at a party, where someone dropped a cake on the floor. He and she were the only two who didn't hesitate to scoop some up anyway.

Diamanda Hagan: "'We've interacted twice, and therefore have romantic chemistry.' Straight people!"

It's not a brand name. Two American companies picked different compound abbreviations at roughly the same time, and somehow one name spread here and the other name spread everywhere else.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

My parents had one where it slid down, and my grandfather had one where it slid up. They looked otherwise identical.

Some thanksgivings we'd have both at the same table and it drove me up the fucking wall.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

In the UK it's mandatory, ostensibly to prevent deliberate overdoses. You can't buy a big bottle of acetaminophen.

In part because they call it paracetamol.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago

See also Grail, who insisted their pronouns must be capitalized.

Respecting people's gender is not carte blanche to make up rules. Like, I can't say my pronouns have italicized vowels during local business hours, and must use thee / thou / thine if you're disagreeing with me. That's simply not what pronouns are for. It's not why they matter.

Taking a 'shut up and do it anyway' approach to moderation is simpler, and perhaps understandable. But you have to acknowledge that's what you're doing. When you genuinely believe there is no limit, that gender is both super fucking important and so meaningless that it can be anything, people are going to try politely talking you through some immediately obvious problems.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Moo! Moo, moo moo!

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Right, he didn't believe it until it came from his ingroup. Which is the same thing with more steps.

None of the words changed... only who was saying them.

 

Reviewing an even blend of McMansions, recent insurance write-offs, and incomprehensible follies.

 

Pleasant warbling synths forever.

 

You're gonna have a bad time.

 

Instrumental grooves with just a little bit of Del Shannon.

view more: next ›