If you had anything you wouldn't still be fucking around in the Monero spaces defending yourself saying anything and everything except actually demonstrating that you're not full of shit.
mister_monster
So publish it then. You got paid to. Oh that's right, "not in my interest to prove what I'm saying is true" because you didn't make anything. Youre full of shit dude.
He's got 2 articles about how none of the accusations are true. He just couldn't figure out how to link them in here, just like he can't figure out how to release the source code he supposedly has so he can get paid.
Here's his drivel if you want to read it https://kewbit.org/kewbit-responds-to-creator-of-basicswapdex-com-ofrnxmr/ https://kewbit.org/addressing-the-false-proclamation-of-exit-scamming-allegations-by-basicswapdex/
I say, ditch sunk cost fallacy and call this a 75 XMR lesson. Nobody needs to trifle with this guy any longer.
OK, so what exact service are they offering here? Someone pays Monero, it goes straight to your wallet. Want do you need to pay per transaction to them for?
An offer that's on the book is on the book. If the person who made it wants to take it down they can. If it's still there you can take it.
Of course they do. Not all of them, but they do. Just like grocery stores to 10% off stuff they want gone. If someone needs to sell fast, the best incentive is a little discount.
Letely, the price is going up but many of those offers may have been made a day ago or something.
Also, some people may be willing to take a little haircut to get the trade done fast. This is how price discovery works on an order book, spreads should get smaller as liquidity goes up
Well, the concept of a ban list seems ripe for abuse. We have to trust someone to tell us canonically who the bad nodes are, people can slap a fed honeypot node label on you for not going along with something.
What we need to do is design the system such that a bad node can do nothing but participate in the network. Just like the mining incentive structure with nakamoto consensus. Dandelion++ is supposed to do that, at least for everyone broadcasting their transactions only to initial nodes they know and trust. I don't know how to do that, but a blacklist is a dangerous stopgap.
But with dandelion++ it should be infeasible to deduce anything about a transaction on receipt, no?
Swaps via Exolix. I use monerujo, but no thanks on that. Exolix is sketch af
Just use obtainium and begin to move away from app stores. Any git repository on any server (doesn't have to be github, could be a gitlab, gitea or forgejo server) that does compiled APK releases for your hardware can be used as a source repo with obtainium, no need for all the overhead any of the app stores require.
Never heard of it, I will not use something not listed on kycnot.me, I'd guess a fly by night operation which usually is a very high risk proposition, I wouldn't use it.
Are you really replying to yourself and me twice?