mohKohn

joined 2 years ago
[–] mohKohn@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

in the bay? you're hilarious.

[–] mohKohn@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

the assassination of Alexander the second backfired completely.

[–] mohKohn@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago

many other places bury their wires and or do proper maintenance

[–] mohKohn@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago
[–] mohKohn@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

found the astronomer

[–] mohKohn@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

weird grammar to say someone made it up?

[–] mohKohn@kbin.social 30 points 2 years ago (10 children)

I'm sorry Russian cat girls? Wat?

[–] mohKohn@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There's a distinction to be made between things that "look" dystopian, and actual dystopias. I think a lot of our current visual language of dystopia was taken from fascist/communist design choices which were in many respects independent of all the oppression they perpetrated. this example really drove that home for me, since the media it inspired came to mind before the reality.

[–] mohKohn@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago (3 children)

wow, I was assuming metropolis. it just screams dystopia to me, but I guess they had to get that aesthetic from somewhere

[–] mohKohn@kbin.social 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

12 people. we're talking about 12 people, so any conclusions are suspect. that being said, facial recognition struggling with black faces from insufficient data is an extremely common problem, so it'd be unsurprising

[–] mohKohn@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

you know, I'm not sure I've seen a subtweet on the fediverse until now.

[–] mohKohn@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

the specific people are all (with the exception of Sam Altmann) grifters. they are

  1. guy whose sub imploded at the titanic
    2 Sam Altman, head of OpenAI (which went from charity to a wing of Microsoft).
  2. Sam Bankman Freid's brother, who was talking about buying an island to carry "effective altruists" through an extinction-level event.

It pisses me off that these are the first EA adjacent people that are broadly well-known, rather than Givewell and 80,000 hours, who are actually doing good work.

 

It encapsulated the fact that a species could have high mortality at one point in its life cycle, then low mortality at another, while a complementary species might have low mortality at the first point and high mortality at the second. The more similar this term was for two species, the more likely it was that a pair could live alongside each other despite competing for space and nutrition.

TLDR: There are way more species than you might expect in a system with inter-species competition because different lifespans allow for niches to exist across time as well.

The actual paper

view more: next ›