mwguy

joined 6 months ago
[–] mwguy@infosec.exchange 1 points 15 hours ago

@finitebanjo @melpomenesclevage If Biden had the debate performance in the primary that he had on the General he would have lost to a wet paper bag.

[–] mwguy@infosec.exchange 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

@Cryophilia I agree with you, that's why I voted for Harris, even though there are multitudes of major politicians I would support before her. But if elections were just about what was objectively best almost no elected officials would be in office. You have to at least attempt to play the game of politics and the DNC has flatly refused to do so the last three elections (and lost two of them).

This is the time to discuss that. There's a non-zero chance that the DNC tries to anoint someone like Tim Kaine like $insult to the nomination and then they loose to some Diet Trump person. And I really don't think waiting until 2032 to fix what's being broken today is a good plan.

[–] mwguy@infosec.exchange 4 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

@Cryophilia @crusa187 Harris failed because given the choice <%1% of Democrats would choose her as their candidate in an open, competitive primary. When she ran for the nomination in 2020 she got less than 1k votes nationwide, among female candidates she was 5th, and when Biden announced that he wanted a black woman VP, the logical choice was Stacy Abrams, not Harris.

Harris is a deeply flawed candidate who doesn't appeal to really any single group except maybe cops. And cops always vote Republican.

On top of that, without a primary, she lacked a fresh bench of exciting Democrats to recruit to campaign and join her staff (think of the way Buttigieg was an effective campaigner in the Rust Belt for Biden) and she didn't have a competent campaign staff who knew her as a candidate and had just figured out how to be a national candidate.

The DNC failed this election by not holding primaries for a Candidate that was clearly mentally compromised. And it cost them the election. If you replace Trump with "Generic Republican" it would have been a Reagan '84 level bloodbath.

[–] mwguy@infosec.exchange 1 points 1 week ago

@remixtures@tldr.nettime.org Secure in persons and papers means that if I choose to make it so secure, there is no Lawful access.

[–] mwguy@infosec.exchange 2 points 2 weeks ago

@jqubed @jeffw Because he's a good backup, 4M/yr 3M/yr guaranteed is a pretty good bargain for a guy who can still sling it. What else were you going to do?

[–] mwguy@infosec.exchange 2 points 1 month ago

@lolrightythen Hello fellow vikes fan!

 

@usa Trump won’t rule out deploying US troops to support rebuilding Gaza, sees ‘long-term’ US ownership

https://apnews.com/article/trump-netanyahu-washington-ceasefire-1c8deec4dd46177e08e07d669d595ed3

Welcome to 'Murica Gazan. Grab your guns, shoot up a school; you'll fit right in. #gaza

[–] mwguy@infosec.exchange 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)
 

@cybersecurity Musk’s DOGE Minions Refuse to Reveal Their Names When Grilling Civil Servants

https://www.thedailybeast.com/musks-doge-minions-refuse-to-reveal-their-names-when-grilling-civil-servants/

Important note from the article relevant to cybersecurity:

> Several government workers who have been interviewed by Musk’s team about their work say the billionaire’s representatives declined to give their surnames and refused to answer any questions themselves, according to the New York Times.

The above combine with the recent threat by the DoJ to prosecute members of the government who don't fully comply with DOGE's actions makes the whole government at risk for social engineering.

#DOGE #Musk #socialengineering

 

@politics Mystery OPM server that aided buyout offers prompts House Democrat probe

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5125573-opm-server-installation-controversy/

AI Summary (Testing out):

> House Oversight Democrats are demanding answers about a "server of unknown nature and origin" installed at the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) that was used for sending buyout offers to federal employees. They are also questioning how OPM was able to assemble a list of employees, which appears to be done from cobbling together existing email lists and datasets. Democrats argue that this process could have violated laws dictating how the agency must plan for using databases with personally identifiable information. The letter also mentions a suit under the E-Government Act of 2002 and raises concerns about the security of federal workers. OPM did not immediately respond to request for comment.

[–] mwguy@infosec.exchange 2 points 1 month ago (5 children)

@GreenEngineering3475 The NFL needs to start treating Achilles injuries as 2 year injuries at best. They are trying to bring people back too soon.

[–] mwguy@infosec.exchange 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@RandAlThor It's still hard to believe that Maga is outraged at a one knee but okay with 2 Nazi salutes.

[–] mwguy@infosec.exchange 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@alexc Yes but the US doesn't prevent you from that and won't jail you for that. Canada enforces that law.

 

@usa Mexican president reveals U.S. concession Trump failed to mention as tariffs paused

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-mexico-guns/

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo issued a "read-out" of her call with U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday — but her list of what the two leaders agreed to is different from his in one major respect: guns.

Washington Post staff writer Meryl Kornfield pointed out on X that in Sheinbaum's list of things the U.S. had committed to do is stop the flow of guns into Mexico.

view more: next ›