sanguinepar

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, 7" singles, playing at 45rpm (and therefore sometimes called 45s)

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Not afraid of AI. Contemptuous of its use for creative tasks though.

It's ok, as a human, not to have the ability to be creative. And nobody has the right to that ability either, it's just the way it is.

Using a machine to mimic (or rip off) the efforts of genuinely creative people does not make the person using the AI creative.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Or just use your own creativity if you have it, and don't if you don't.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Oh god, right enough, I'd forgotten about those, and that whole casino thing! God damn, I hated that movie...

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No, the horses were in Rise of Skywalker.

The Last Jedi was the one with the "Can you hear me now?" gags, and Luke tossing the lightsaber away.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Scot here (Edinburgh), and I'd usually only use "Back of 4" to mean a few minutes past, maybe ten minutes at most. Same as "just after 4".

May vary though depending on where in Scotland you go :-)

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You're saying cats cause human wars?

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Mid 40s here - I mostly listen to stuff I'm already familiar with (albeit a pretty wide range, or at least I think so), and/or stuff which is from the same eras/genres/etc, particularly if it's something acknowledged as influential on something else I know I like

Eg 1 - I'm a huge R.E.M. fan, and via them I discovered (some time ago, admittedly) artists like Patti Smith, the Velvet Underground, Leonard Cohen, etc.

Eg 2 - I am very much into house/techno, and have discovered so much great stuff old and new via a regular recommendations event on BlueSky (#RaveyardShift, Saturday nights from about 10pm, UK time, if anyone is interested!)

Eg 3 Although I don't do this so much any more, I found that getting Tidal to generate a radio station based on a single song I like is often a great way to discover other great music in that genre whether it's funk/soul, hip hop, post punk or whatever.

In all of the above, almost none of it is new... but it's usually new to me, and that's good enough.

I used to worry that I wasn't keeping up with new music, but after a while I realised that that's ok - there's really no need to worry about that as it's literally impossible to hear everything, so just find stuff you enjoy, let others do the same and don't worry about it.

As an aside, I'm not religious at all, but I've long had this concept of "heaven" as a place where you simply have the time and resources to experience EVERYTHING you could ever want to. Every song, every movie, every flavour, every sensation, etc.

That'd be kind of cool. Although I'm conscious that that's the Côtes du Rhône talking... 😁🍷

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Plenty of superb songs use that word. Abandoning the songs altogether isn't the answer IMO. Not singing the word is a better approach than never listening to the music.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This sounds like a decent approach, although it might struggle in instances where the n word is key to a rhyme.

For example, in Nas' NY State of Mind, there's the sequence:

But just a n___a walkin' with his finger on the trigger
Make enough figures until my pockets get bigger

If I'm singing along to that, I now tend to leave a blank space rather than substitute another word. Especially because another word which rhymed could easily be mistaken for the real thing!

I would absolutely never use the word in casual speech, but there was a brief period in the past where I felt that it was more respectful to the artist/material to use the words exactly as written.

However I realised that I would only ever do that when I was alone - and thinking about why that was the case made me rethink what was really most important and stop doing even that.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

!calvinandhobbes@lemmy.world for more 😁

 

I'm currently trying to get in better shape and to that end have started dieting and cycling in my local area. For motivation, I've decided to try to 'virtually' cycle from John O'Groats (henceforth JOG) in the north of Scotland to Land's End (LE) in the south of England.

To do this, I measure how far I cycle each day (locally) and record my progress, which I then use to map where I would be on the route Google Maps recommends for cycling (I'm handwaving altitude comparisons because it's just for fun).

Ok, so - Maps says the recommended cycling route from JOG to LE is 965 miles. Fine. I've covered 21.1 miles so far (I've only just started and am not very fit).

Now, on the full 965 mile route, that 21.1 miles gets me to a small village called Haimer. However, if I ask Maps to plot me a route from JOG to Haimer, Maps says it's only 18.7 miles.

I've tried the same thing with other towns on the route, and the same is true there too - there's a roughly 10% disparity, even though the route being plotted is identical. A few yards here or there I could understand, but a 10% difference?? FFS.

 

This is a sort of comedy western, based around a high stakes poker game. I saw it years ago and loved it. Truth be told, I can't remember a great deal more about it, and don't want to spoil it for myself by looking it up, but I definitely remember enjoying it a lot.

 

So, even if you had been immune, through previous illness, vaccination or via maternal milk, you may not be anymore after having measles.

I had never heard this until today, and it's an absolutely horrifying thought.

You're welcome.

1
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by sanguinepar@lemmy.world to c/49ers@lemmy.world
 

~~Josh~~ Brandon Allan will start at QB.

Packers game already looked tough, this just feels like another kick in the teeth.

Wish this season would just end tbh.

 

Well, that's a bit awkward...

"Coote was the video assistant referee when a challenge by the Everton goalkeeper Jordan Pickford on Virgil van Dijk that left the Liverpool defender with an anterior cruciate ligament injury went unpunished."

"Coote also drew the ire of Klopp as the VAR for the 1-1 draw between Liverpool and Arsenal last December after an apparent handball in the box by Martin Ødegaard did not lead to a penalty."

 

Per this thread, I'm wondering if it might be possible to create feeds of favourited people or communities.

I guess this would be similar to how multireddits worked and since that's not available on Lemmy, this might not be either. But maybe some smart person out there knows of a way.

It's not even me that wants to do it, but I'm invested in an answer now! :-)

 

Returning to practice a month and a half after getting shot? Goddamn...

133
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by sanguinepar@lemmy.world to c/pics@lemmy.world
 

Love it when this happens to the clouds. Purple and red and yellow and on fire...

 

I've decided (after seeing the advice repeatedly!) to try and move away from Chrome and use FF instead. However I've immediately come across an issue which is a bit of a deal-breaker for me, and although I've looked into it, I haven't seen an answer anywhere.

One of the best features in Chrome is the abilty to create a shortcut for an individual URL. This shortcut can then be placed on the desktop, start menu or quicklaunch toolbar (Win 10) and opened as if it were a program in its own right - so, no URL bar, no tabs, no bookmarks, just the site content.

I use this method every day for a number of different sites - Outlook, Gmail, Calendar, Keep, Sheets, Docs, etc, and it's perfect. So much so that I usually forget that I'm technically opening all of these in Chrome at all, not least because the site favicon shows in the taskbar in place of the browser logo.

So, I assumed that FF would be able to do the same thing... but apparently not. Am I missing something? I've found people discussing old features like SSB (site-specific browsing) and PWA (progressive web apps), but as far as I can tell all work on this in FF has been discontinued.

I would maybe just put up with this, and use Chrome shortcuts for these sites, and FF for everything else, except that links clicked from within them will open in Chrome intead of FF, which makes for a confusing experience.

Anyone know of a good solution to this? Thanks in advance!

 

Or at least that's what Google says they are... :-)

 

Already getting sick of seeing 'AI' results at the top of a search when all you want is a link to a site?

I just discovered this article showing a way to not see it (although it doesn't disable it altogether).

TLDR:

  • In Chrome open settings menu, choose Search engine on left menu and scroll down to site search
  • Click Add button and choose a name (eg Old Google, Google Web or whatever)
  • Add a shortcut word (eg web, og, or whatever)
  • Add this URL string: https://www.google.com/search?q=%25s&udm=14
  • Save that, and now if you search for something and use the shortcut word you set you'll just get proper results, no 'AI' shown
  • Or, if you don't want to have to add a shortcut word, you just make that search your default (use the 3 dot menu next to the name you set) and all searches will show that way, no shortcut word needed.

EDIT - meant to add that there are detailed instructions for Edge, Firefox and Safari in the article if you don't use Chrome

Hope that helps someone - I really don't like all that extra nonsense when I just want a link to a site that I know exists!

[Obligatory - "or don't use Chrome/Google...", I know - but people do, so this might be useful]

 

Just wondering if anyone knows of a way to do this?

Here's my use case in more detail

I have a laptop and a PC, with the laptop connecting to one of my 2 monitors via an HDMI splitter. This allows me to use my PC on both screens most of the time, but then quickly switch one monitor to show the laptop, when required.

Only thing is that doing that causes all PC windows* on Screen 2 to jump to Screen 1, while Screen 2 now shows the laptop's windows. That's fine, and I get why it does that (effectively the PC thinks I've disconnected Screen 2).

* (usually it's a bunch of Chrome windows, 5-7 of them - for work/multi-client reasons this works best for me and my PC handles it fine)

When I switch the HDMI splitter back, all PC windows remain on Screen 1, while Screen 2 is once again showing my PC desktop, but with no windows. Ideally all windows would flip back to where they were before, but I don't think there's a way to do this, and again, that's fine.

My next preferred option is to be able to able to move all Chrome windows over from Screen 1 to Screen 2 quickly - and this is what I'm looking for advice on. I can't seem to find a way to "select" all/multiple Chrome windows and shift them to Screen 2, but it feels like there must be a way?

Any help greatly appreciated :-)

view more: next ›