ssladam

joined 2 years ago
[–] ssladam@lemmy.world 61 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yep. Running the standard playbook. They wouldn't do it, if it wasn't so effective. Today they'd be calling the Boston Tea Party a bunch of anti-caffeine health nuts.

[–] ssladam@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Think of it this way .. if you sign up at a karate dojo, there are a ton of rules and norms you'll need to follow. And those rules and norms will be very different dojo to dojo. That's an understood expectation. It's similar to college. The professor is empowered to dictate the structure and norms of their course.

And sure... The professor will dictate their expectations on day 1. If you don't like the structure, you have 2 weeks to change the course with no penalty.

[–] ssladam@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

In this case, you can argue that "not showing up" is doing their job, since they're protecting the voice of their constituents.

Republicans:Dems in Texas are currently 25:12 (one vacant seat), versus if they had truly fair districting, it would be 21:17.

They want to push it even more extreme. That seems unfair, and undemocratic to me.

[–] ssladam@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Nah. You're not thinking like a politician. The real answer is, "this will be a PR disaster for them. LOL this is really goin to help my fundraising"

[–] ssladam@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

He could have put in so many safeguards on his way out the door. Instead he chose to do nothing, except pardon his own family

[–] ssladam@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If you've visited almost any website then Google ads are tracking you. Unless you're a masochist running full lockout, noscript, and eliminate the use of cookies.... Google is following you.

[–] ssladam@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Eh. It's always been a part of discourse. If they instead said, "our view of the administration's workings don't even rise to the level of observing shadows projected on a cave wall, we are truly in the dark", I'm betting you would go right along with it, even though there are plenty of people that wouldn't get the reference.

This just happens to be one you didn't know ... And now you do.

[–] ssladam@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It didn't start as an echo chamber. Initially it was one of the few places online a progressive minded person could go and feel like they could express their opinions openly. And by "progressive" I mean both left and right leaning ideologies.

Which, funny enough is now a foreign concept. We call everyone on the left "progressive", even though Biden and Kamala are clearly conservative Democrats. And we call Vance a "conservative" even though he's clearly a progressive Republican.

[–] ssladam@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You think it's bad? Go look at "popular" while you're not logged in (no subs / filters). It's shocking how insipid the experience is.

[–] ssladam@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Don't worry! It's the types that need to launder money that this will serve. Problem solved!

[–] ssladam@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Jan 16, 2008. Got me beat by a bit. Beat you to Lemmy though, so I guess I've got that going for me.

[–] ssladam@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Repurposing existing pronouns is the problem. Other languages have nice, gender neutral pronouns. We just need a nice new, singular gender neutral pronoun.

Example...

He/she/fai Him/her/hai

Then make it standard to use the neutral version where gender doesn't matter. Telling a story about your teacher? Is it pertinent we need to know the gender? No? Then standardize on the neutral version.

English has always been one of the most fluid languages. Why stop now? Just fix it.

view more: next ›