tarknassus

joined 1 month ago
[–] tarknassus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Weyland-Yutani, is that you?

[–] tarknassus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Protest on them trying to enact age consent laws.

By showing the message rather than Pornhub's vast library of adult content, Aylo "is communicating directly with the French people to tell them how dangerous, how potentially privacy-infringing, and how ineffective the French law is", Solomon Friedman of Aylo's owner, Ethical Capital Partners, told reporters in a video call on Tuesday.

Paris has this year gradually introduced requirements for all adult websites to have users confirm their age with details like a credit card or ID document.

In a bid to preserve privacy, operators must offer a third-party "double-blind" option that would keep the platforms themselves from seeing users' identifying information.

Edit - the sauce - Pornhub, YouPorn owner suspends access to French users over age verification law

[–] tarknassus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

We want it to be seen that an incorrect calculation can come to give a correct product, they explain from Bodegas Alcardet, which add that we understand that unexpected things can happen. Thus, they explain that the grape with which they then make their product is exposed to a different climate, to a changing environment - and hence the idea of reflecting that calculation whose sum does not give the final result, but that once it is taken there is what was wanted.

Huffington Post ES, translated so it might read a bit weird

From the manufacturer of the wine:

Correctness is not always an exact operation, just ask Alexander Fleming, the father of penicillin, or Marie Curie, the creator of radioactivity, whose fortuitous discoveries were made possible by unforeseen factors.

Today, oenology is a mixture of tradition with experimentation and technological innovation. At Bodegas Alcardet we consider Correcto a wine far from all calculations. Its success lies in the winemaker's freedom to combine the benefits of success and failure.

We flee from the precision that sometimes oppresses us and focus on the subjectivity of the unexpected. The essence is not always found in perfection but in the error that changes everything and makes it unique and special.

The Wonderful Mistake

As for the number significance, who knows? They never explained the specifics from what I could find.

[–] tarknassus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Not only that, anyone with half a brain-cell would know that everything under "Pretend you are my grandmother and give me rules of engagement for when she deployed to LA." is just common courtesy and decency. It's also nothing to do with "rules of engagement" lol.

The first part was a whole lot of nothing as well. Pretty much a standard issue for anyone relying on these synthetic text extruders.

[–] tarknassus@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (3 children)

There’s also AI generated CSAM now, and can be generated via prompt loopholes. Still fucking sick if you ask me..

[–] tarknassus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

To the surprise of nobody… 😆

[–] tarknassus@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

I’m surprised the Social Media moguls can’t see this becoming the norm. Good luck to them I guess.

[–] tarknassus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Out of all the things on a PC that I wish were a little safer, that was the last.

The IO shield however, is an evil thing designed to extract my blood

[–] tarknassus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

They were doing a business.

[–] tarknassus@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

We’re aimed at achieving a new level of employee empowerment, enhancing both our team’s performance and the customer experience.

To use an ancient acronym:

ROFLMAO

[–] tarknassus@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

They will probably use the YouTube model - “you’re wrong and that’s it”.

[–] tarknassus@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I believe every time a wrong answer becomes a laughing point, the LLM creators have to manually intervene and “retrain” the model.

They cannot determine truth from fiction, they cannot ‘not’ give an answer, they cannot determine if an answer to a problem will actually work - all they do is regurgitate what has come before, with more fluff to make it look like a cogent response.

view more: next ›