timewarp

joined 2 years ago
[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Well good news if they are successful in their arguments it can set precedent to make piracy legal.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I think the closest you can come is open source an entire business, from business plans, architecture, systems, payment processing, etc.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Have you experienced this yourself?

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Maybe you should stop being one then

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Buttholes can suck?

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Of course, most people would recognize that the laws concerning the transportation of people without seats or seatbelts applies to ALL vehicles and only a completely disingenuous fuckwit would focus on the U-Haul part.

Not wearing a seatbelt in the back of a truck isn't an arrestable offense, nor against the law in almost half the states. What if they were seated & wearing safety harnesses? You can always call the Lincoln Heights police & ask for clarification or to lodge a complaint if their safety is a big priority to you.

Another thing that only a disingenuous fuckwit would do is try to equate literal, flag-waving Nazis specifically trying to incite hatred and fear towards minorities with all other public gatherings.

I didn't, but what I said were things that upsets people. Abortion upsets people where pro-lifers believe it is murder. Supporting Palestine upsets people where pro-Israelis believe it is supporting terrorists. Just because something doesn't upset you, doesn't mean it doesn't upset other people. Clearly you get upset very easily. Are you not able to regulate your emotions or did you forget to take your meds?

And pretty much all the examples you gave have a history of police breaking them up for precisely the reasons I listed, but the cops didn’t lift a finger here

You didn't cite any cases, so if you want to make a point then link to some legal cases and I'll cross-check them with similar cases.

I don’t type this for you, because you already know you’re full of shit.

You failed to provide any evidence or cite a single case. All you do is scream like your parents took away your Xbox. You typed this to try to prove to yourself that you're way more intelligent than all the attorneys, legal scholars, amicus curiae's, judges, etc. that have already litigated matters like this, which I argue are way more beneficial to causes you might actually care about if you'd listen & stop screeching. Were you never taught any coping mechanisms or do you not know how to do legal research? Nothing gets done by screaming.

Almost everything you've said indicates to me you're a fascist. You want to censor people that non-violently expresses opinions you don't like, you don't care about the rule of law and you don't see other humans that offend you as being anything more than "a worthless waste of oxygen."

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So what are you arguing for exactly then. That since the cops have committed injustices, that they should commit more? When someone gets arrested & charges get dropped due to insufficient evidence, then that is the perfect opportunity for someone to file a lawsuit for violating their civil rights. I'm not pretending that injustices don't happen, but the solution in my eyes isn't for more injustice.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Transporting 30+ people in the back of an unsecured U-Haul

LOL.. what statute is this, never heard of U-Haul crime before.

Causing a disturbance? Public Nuisance? Disorderly Conduct?

I don't think you even know what some of these are cause if you did then you wouldn't suggest them, but you're suggesting anytime people organize together to exercise their free speech that they should be arrested because people get upset that they have gathered. So I guess no more pride festivals cause they'd all get locked up. No more pro-choice marches cause they'd get locked up. The list goes on and on. Is that really what you want?

Do you not think that has been tried before and that courts have ruled on it? Maybe go read some case law & try to make an intelligent argument.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world -5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

So they are upset that the cops arrested people in this instance for breaking the law? If people were attacking them & damaging their property because they didn't like their free speech, then that is a crime.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So you're unwilling to do any actual work or put any effort into understanding the current law and how you'd go about changing it if that is what you think should happen? How does complaining about cops acting within the law help you in this case?

 

This lawsuit was filed with Plaintiffs being the States' of New Mexico, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont & Washington. It requests both declaratory & injunctive relief.

What needs to happen is if a federal judge makes a ruling & Musk ignores it, then he needs to be held in contempt & jailed until he complies. In which case they will immediately appeal, likely to try to get it to the Supreme Court. If Supreme Court says Musk can do whatever he wants then you know it is time to organize for succession.

 

Google Gemini seems to have been programmed to provide cookie cutter responses when asked questions about whether Trump tried to overturn the election.

When you point it out to Gemini, it says it isn't programmed to avoid any topics or viewpoints.

Even saying you'll accept a variety of sources & viewpoints on the topic to reach your own conclusion, results in it saying it can't answer.

When asking if it has been trained on research papers, case law, indexed news stories & even Wikipedia results, it says that it has.

37
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by timewarp@lemmy.world to c/enoughmuskspam@lemmy.world
 

Elon Musk was forced to admit that Grok sucks donkey balls today, of which he also has a penchant for the equestrian variety, like the time Musk offered a SpaceX flight attendant a horse that he had been inseminating believing he could create a Centaur.

He expressed to the world he sucks at creating companies, and is only capable of buying them. He made this statement when he said that even for close to 100 billion dollars wouldn't be enough for his team of incels to compete with ChatGPT-AI, led by sister-molester Sam Altman. Recently a Chinese company called DeepSeek was able to match ChatGPT for less than 10 million dollars, and without the need of a sister-molester.

 

@gnukeith on X, a @Brave + $BAT Ambassador specifically chosen by Brave is now promoting far-right extremists on X.

Brave CEO, Brendan Eich, was previously ousted from his role as CEO of Mozilla, after it was found that he had donated to Prop 8, a campaign in California aimed at banning gay marriage. Despite Brendan Eich claiming at the time that he regrets his decision, he has since made multiple social media posts defending his anti-gay position.

At some point people must decide whether they wish to ditch the Fox, as Brave started advertising to users searching up Firefox on the Google Play Store, or if they want to ditch the anti-LGBTQ+ browser.

 
 

This is an unpopular opinion, and I get why – people crave a scapegoat. CrowdStrike undeniably pushed a faulty update demanding a low-level fix (booting into recovery). However, this incident lays bare the fragility of corporate IT, particularly for companies entrusted with vast amounts of sensitive personal information.

Robust disaster recovery plans, including automated processes to remotely reboot and remediate thousands of machines, aren't revolutionary. They're basic hygiene, especially when considering the potential consequences of a breach. Yet, this incident highlights a systemic failure across many organizations. While CrowdStrike erred, the real culprit is a culture of shortcuts and misplaced priorities within corporate IT.

Too often, companies throw millions at vendor contracts, lured by flashy promises and neglecting the due diligence necessary to ensure those solutions truly fit their needs. This is exacerbated by a corporate culture where CEOs, vice presidents, and managers are often more easily swayed by vendor kickbacks, gifts, and lavish trips than by investing in innovative ideas with measurable outcomes.

This misguided approach not only results in bloated IT budgets but also leaves companies vulnerable to precisely the kind of disruptions caused by the CrowdStrike incident. When decision-makers prioritize personal gain over the long-term health and security of their IT infrastructure, it's ultimately the customers and their data that suffer.

view more: next ›