unknownuserunknownlocation

joined 1 week ago

Ob Döner oder Drehspieß hat nur mit dem Fleischanteil zu tun. Hähnchendöner darf es nach wie vor geben. Also zumindest theoretisch machen sie da nichts falsch solange der Fleischanteil hoch genug ist.

[–] unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Do you even know how many people are killed by cars each year? This is nothing compared to that. Most cases cited here are because people acted completely recklessly. The same can't be said about many car accidents.

[–] unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Ich möchte nicht wissen, wer ihn ersetzt. Bei dem aktuellen Druck von der Politik kann das nicht gut werden. Ich befürchte schon Mehdorn 2.0

Yup.

Legal experts agree, a sale to The Onion is more likely now that Infowars' fate has shifted to Texas state court.

[–] unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth 21 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I always love the irony when people worry that others are being dictated on how to dress so they then themselves dictate to people how they can dress.

Yup, I saw that one as well after I left this comment. It showed really well not only that this is the largest number of journalists killed in such a conflict, but by really, really far. And did it in a way that shocked even me.

You don't have to apologize for "therapy speak" - this is off my chest, after all. And it seems, it needed to get out, you needed to tell someone, you wanted to be heard. And that is completely legitimate. In fact, it's a step in the right direction - you've come from bottling it up to telling someone - even if it's "just" on the internet. It's a important step forward.

What you're feeling is entirely justified. What happened to you is unacceptable, and high blood pressure or whatever else is no excuse. Most importantly, it's not your fault. You had a right to a proper childhood.

I don't know how the healthcare situation is where you live, but I would recommend looking into therapy. It's not an overnight cure, give it plenty of time - I mean, years. It will be worth it.

Also, I don't know if you still live with your mother - if you do, I would be sure to move out. Find an apprenticeship you like, find an interesting job, an interesting field of study, something that gets you amount like minded people. Maybe there are some programming related jobs around? If you already have a history on whichever git platform, that can look great on a resume.

Sending you a hug from the other side of the internet. It's going to be OK.

P.S. Many adults don't really feel much like adults, either. You're in good company.

[–] unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth 40 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I watched that segment. I remember them saying very clearly that Israel didn't allow them to film it. So you know what they did? They showed footage from the ground, and didn't mince words as to how horrific things were. They showed the landscape, where barely anything is standing. They showed people digging through the ground looking for spilled kernels. There was absolutely no way you could watch that report and not understand the insanity of what is going on there.

In fact, anyone who follows CBC's news coverage has no reason to not understand the depths of the horrors happening in Gaza, or in Palestine in general. They don't shove it into the corner. They place it center stage. Again, and again, and again. As if to say, "don't forget what is happening here".

The CBC definitely has its faults, but this article is blowing things way, way out of proportion.

[–] unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Good to know... Although hitting enter twice or adding two spaces makes me feel like a boomer. Oh well

[–] unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth 5 points 3 days ago (3 children)

OK, weird, I had them in there, but I added a second newline per paragraph and it seems to look better now.

[–] unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth 10 points 3 days ago (7 children)

I might not have everything, but here's the best summary I can put together:

This back and forth has been going on for a while now. The main complaints more recently have been the timing of his pull requests, and just generally his attitude and cooperation with others. The most recent spat was because he submitted a feature in the rc3 merge window, whereas you're only supposed to submit Bugfixes in that time frame. The feature in question was a journal rewind function, which would essentially move the filesystem back in time, which could fix an issue that did crop up in the testing phase. As such, he saw it as a workaround to fix an issue that had arisen, and so despite it technically being a feature, he saw it in the category of Bugfixes. The caused major disagreements as well as the way he talked with others. And now his pull request for rc1 has been simply ignored by Linus.

The point where Kent is coming from is that he wants a rock solid file system, and he's following a bit of a take no prisoners approach to reach that goal. He seems to get most of his income from his following on Patreon, and so his focus is squarely on the users. With that focus, he seems to lose sight of other things, especially the cooperation with others in the kernel team. In fact, a number of people he has sparred with have shown decent respect for his code recently, saying the problem is really the cooperative aspect. One of the main reasons for bcachefs is also the lack of a proper CoW-filesystem in the Linux kernel that doesn't have the kinds of problems that btrfs has. And the fact that he states this and also talks about the lessons he's learnt from btrfs's shortcomings rubs a number of people the wrong way.

Now here's some stuff I read into this personally: I have the impression that Kent looks up to Linus in a way. And they're actually both kind of similar: they both are extremely talented engineers, they both saw something missing in the software landscape and said "fuck it, I'll make it myself", and they both can be pretty serious dicks. I mean Linus managed to get suspended from his own damn project for being a dick - now that's an achievement. He's older now and somewhat calmer, but even recently he had quite the outburst on the mailing list. And I get the impression I get is that Kent (probably subconsciously?) has an attitude of "if he can do it, so can I". Which would be fair (even though it is poisonous), the only problem being Linus having the longer lever.

Then there's the aspect of his mental health. He has said multiple times that his mental health has been suffering, which honestly doesn't surprise me. And if you look at his responses in different places, there seems to be quite an up and down. In some cases, he's very respectful to Linus, and in some cases he's pretty nasty (yes, Linus level nasty, but still). As far as I can tell, he needs a break and therapy. The only problem being, bcachefs has quite the momentum currently, and it wouldn't exactly be great for the project to lose that momentum, either. (Mind you, probably still better than being kicked from the kernel)

That's the next frustrating part - as soon as you mention something like that, many people assume that you're nice just hoping that it gets you laid or something. Of course, if you're doing something nice to someone just to get laid - of course that's manipulative. And that's the thing - manipulative assholes tend to be more successful in that regard! I insist on being nice despite it making things more difficult when it comes to dating. I don't use it to guilt trap people into doing anything with me they don't want to. The one time I was able to help someone out of an abusive situation (which, to be clear, I didn't do to somehow get together with her - I never had any interest in a relationship with her), that was actually one of the main things we worked on - ensuring that she listens more to herself and what she wants, and that she has every right to say no, no matter who it is. But it's frustrating to see when people do start using guilt tripping and end up getting way further than I do. My moral compass is more important. It doesn't change the fact that that being a disadvantage can be pretty frustrating. Think about it like this: imagine you have a job at a normal company - let's say in public works - and make an OK living. It's not great, you really have to budget, but you can afford rent and groceries. But then you see your neighbor making multiple times what you make - by manipulating and scamming people. You will never do the "work" he does, because it's morally reprehensible. That doesn't change the fact that when you look at the situation, you probably go: "that's not exactly fair".

 

Trigger warning: abuse, suicide First off, I'm not taking about guys who call themselves nice and act like manipulative jerks. I'm talking about people who are legitimately nice, caring and loving. As such, this doesn't only apply to men. Storytime: a good number of years ago, I got to know someone who I not too long after started a relationship with. She was loving, kind, and caring - really, what I look for when it comes to relationship material. Except... She still lived at home, and her "mother" was horrifically abusive. Unfortunately, also very intelligent, so that she was always a couple of steps ahead of you. Well, she also got abusive towards me very quickly but was such a master of manipulation and Gaslighting that I had no clue what the fuck was going on. I also didn't know how abuse worked, so I was ripe for the picking. A year and a horrific half later, I got "kicked out" (in other words, my then girlfriend was gaslit into projecting all of the faults of her own mother onto me leading to a messy breakup) because I started asking too many questions and didn't simply accept what I was being told, including that I allegedly had memory problems (which turned out to be pure and utter bullshit to gaslight me). So, I finished last, I lost the person who I thought was going to be the love of my life and I was ready to marry eventually. You know who also finished last? The women who would have liked to been with her father, who is a great guy. The likelihood that any one of them could have been worse than her is exceedingly small. You have to achieve that kind of evil first. My ex? Still living at her parents' place. Word made it around that my ex's and her father's cars at some point regularly had nails and screws under their tires, which mysteriously stopped when one of the father's friends told him "you know exactly who did that if you're honest with yourself". Well, I did a shit ton of reading on psychology and abuse to understand what the hell I went through. And also in the hopes of helping them, but as mentioned, it didn't work. But the fact that I know so much about it, have experienced it myself and tend to try and listen to people when they tell me about their situations means that I seem to be a magnet for victims of abuse. I always try to help. I know how awful my situation was and if I can help someone out of a similar situation, I will do what I can. But it's often frustrating. But I actually was able to help someone out of an abusive situation. After a suicide attempt due to the effects of the abuse I landed in the hospital, and got to know someone there fairly well. She was also in an abusive situation. And I actually was able to help her out of it! Mind you, it was after I had lost count of her suicide attempts, but hey, you take the victories you get. So hey, at least in that situation it wasn't as bad... But fast forward to the last few months. A colleague I've known for a little over a year and a half tells me more and more about her friend with benefits. She tells me almost right from the start, that it's a toxic relationship. I hoped it's not that bad. After a couple of tell tale signs too many, yup, it's abuse. Long story short, we also started developing feelings for each other and were hoping to help each other through what we were dealing with. Well, the fwb made sure to fuck it up. She even said, otherwise, she's an afterthought for him (even though he expects to be at the top of her priority list), but in a case where he might lose her, he will fight for her. When I asked how, she described exactly what he did in my case. But still doesn't see that he did it in my case. And now the feelings she told me about apparently weren't feelings but something else, and he's suddenly not as bad and besides the constant manipulation and if you ask me rapey behavior, he's actually quite OK... Like don't get me wrong, my primary concern is that she gets out of that situation, which doesn't look particularly likely at the moment, but to get back to the topic, yet another case of the nice guy finished last. Rant over. TL;DR: fuck abusers and the people who enable them. And why the fuck are they often more successful than the people who don't abuse people.

view more: next ›