Flippanarchy
Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Rules
-
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
-
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
-
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
-
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
-
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
-
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
view the rest of the comments
In all seriousness, is Kropotkin still good to read nowadays? Or are there other authors I should read first?
It is a bit old fashioned these days. David Graeber or Murray Bookchin are more modern starting points I think.
Personally, I really like Kropotkin. Him and Errico Malatesta are my favorite anarchist theorists.
You can go with Norman Baillargeon and Chomsky.
Seems to be very French language specific and Chomsky is really not a good starting point for Anarchism specifically.
I think so, but to be honest: I haven't finished The Conquest of Bread. I just chose it as a placeholder.
It's a bit old but Kropotkin was one of the first anarchist authors whose models of society have stood the test of time (unlike Proudhon and Bakunin IMHO). I also liked Malatesta's "Anarchy!" and the "ABC's of anarchism" by Alexander Berkman.
If you're looking for something more contemporary, I think "Anarchy works" by Peter Gelderlos is quite good.