this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
155 points (98.1% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

57305 readers
221 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

Torrenting:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/18686776

Meta claims torrenting pirated books isn’t illegal without proof of seeding

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] recursive_recursion@lemmy.ca 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I'm half meming with the title but at the same time Meta publicly claiming that pirating books isn't illegal if there's no proof of seeding seems real ridiculous

Zuck continues to display true idiocy at work:

  • rules for thee but not for capitalists
[–] Outtatime@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Well. That statement isn't completely wrong. If there is no evidence and can't be proven

load more comments (2 replies)