this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
99 points (97.1% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

57305 readers
286 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

Torrenting:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/18686776

Meta claims torrenting pirated books isn’t illegal without proof of seeding

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] recursive_recursion@lemmy.ca 29 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm half meming with the title but at the same time Meta publicly claiming that pirating books isn't illegal if there's no proof of seeding seems real ridiculous

Zuck continues to display true idiocy at work:

  • rules for thee but not for capitalists
[–] matey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 13 hours ago

On the other hand, making new precedent?

[–] Outtatime@sh.itjust.works 4 points 13 hours ago

Well. That statement isn't completely wrong. If there is no evidence and can't be proven

[–] Noughtmare@programming.dev 9 points 13 hours ago